OCR Text |
Show a verified statement in duplicate, dupli-cate, bearing publication No. 711, which shall set forth as to such mining claim: (1) Name of claim; (2) The date of location; (3) The book and page of recordation re-cordation of the Notice or certificate cer-tificate of location; (4) The section or sections of the public land surveys which embrace such mining claim; or if such lands are un-surveyed un-surveyed either the section or sections which would probably embrace such mining claim when the public land surveys are extended to such lands or a tie by courses and distances to an approved United States mineral monument; (5) Whether such claimant is a locator or purchaser under such location; and 1 (6) The name and address of such claimant and names and addresses so far as known: to the claimant of any other person per-son or persons claiming any interest or interests in or under un-der such unpatented mining claim; such failure shall be conclusively conclus-ively deemed (i) to constitute a waiver and relinquishment by such mining claimant of any I right, title or interest under such mining claim contrary to or in conflict with the limitations limita-tions or restrictions specified in section 4 of the Act of July 23, 1955 (69 Stat. 367), as to unpatented claims located after that date, and (ii) to constitute consti-tute a consent by such mining claimant that such unpatented mining claim shall be subject to said limitations and restrictions, restric-tions, and (iii) to precluds thereafter, prior to issuance of patent, any assertion by such mining claimant of any right or title to or interest in or under such mining claim contrary to or in conflict with said limitations limita-tions or restrictions. Section 4 provides, generally, that unpatented unpat-ented mining claims located after July 23, 1955, shall not be used for purposes other than prospecting, mining, or processing operations - or use? reasonably incident thereto; that such claims will be subject sub-ject to the right of the United States to manage and dispose of the vegetative surface resources re-sources thereof and to manage other surface resources thereof; there-of; and that except to the extent ex-tent required for mining operations oper-ations and uses reasonaby inci dent thereto or to provide clearance for such operations or uses, claimants of such claims shall not use or dispose of vegetative or other surface resources thereof; and that, except ex-cept for such purposes, any permitted severance or removal of timber must be in accordance accord-ance with sound principles of forest management. Said section sec-tion 4 also provides that any use of the surface of any such mining claim by the United States, its permitees or licensees, licen-sees, shall be such a"s not to endanger en-danger or materially interfere with the prospecting, mining, processing or reasonably incident inci-dent uses by the mining claimant. claim-ant. The date of first publication of this notice shall be October 26, 1962. Dated: October 15, 1962. J. E. KEOGH, Manager, Land Office, Bureau of Land Management, Department De-partment of the Interior, Salt Lake City, Utah. By G. M. PRISBREY, Acting Chief, Minerals Section. First Pub.: Oct. 26, 1962. Last Pub.: Dec. 20, 1962. 21 Ny2, NV2SW14. T 30 S, R 16 W: Sees: 1. 3, 10 Ny2, 11 Ny., 12 Ny2, SEi4, 13 E. 2. That if any person claiming claim-ing or asserting under, or by virtue of, any unpatented mining min-ing claim located prior to July 23, 1955, any right, title, or interest in-terest in the vegetative surface resources and other surface resources re-sources under such mining claim, contrary to or in conflict con-flict with the limitations or restrictions re-strictions specified in section 4 of said Act, as to the above described lands or any part thereof, shall fail to file in the Land Office of the Bureau of Land Management at Salt Lake City, Utah, and within 150 days from the below stated date of first publication of this notice Editorial ... USE ROAD MONEYS FOR ROADS Diversion of state funds from their intended use can like Topsy grow and grow. In New Jersey, for example, ex-ample, half of the road-user taxes collected go for projects proj-ects which have nothing at all to do with roads. Over the years, more than three-quarters three-quarters of a billion dollars of New Jersey road money has been short-stopped from Its proper use. In Utah, the problem is nowhere no-where nearly as serious, but there is some diversion of road funds. Now is the time to stop the practice, to stunt Its unwholesome growth. The Instrument which will do this is Amendment Two, the Better Bet-ter Roads Amendment. Responsible citizens who vote for passage of this amendment on election day will be guaranteeing that road revenue will be spent as it should be. The amendment amend-ment provides that all road-user road-user income will go for road construction and improvement, improve-ment, for driver education, for traffic safety law enforcement enforce-ment and for encouraging tourism in Utah. We urge our readers to support Amendment No. 2 on Nov. 6. What happened In New Jersey must not be allowed al-lowed to happen in Utah. |