| Show t SUPREME COURT GOURT COURTIN IN CASE Second Seo District Judge Ju gc is Sus Sustained tamed dill in iii Action ing ino flu Homestead d BANK DANK ACTION Claims Were lIi I etl Hue L trI o e in I I a aTin Tin flu 11 r ill illAn An fl was va h down Jilt HIli morning tit court affirm affirming ing tho Judgment of ut thu which In hi this his was that df f tho ar at Oh n Tito l tr of nl n was the disposition of or f the tho I of or C A dc dlo 1 thc C tt National Hank of ot b Ollen appealing from tim the decision ot or r tho Iho court confirming the tight right of or the tho widow mTnor 1011 to t estate oj or the tilt said is M ft It homestead Thc Tho opinion If q written by lJ jy Chief J J McCarthy Is II J concurred In by I flee and trIck Bedford died Jan In 11 J 9 J lS rn eel cel tain tn tam ivul rul palate r la III Ii county a fl clock of hii EI I 0 nIl j roll roH I estate elta est att ap up praised tet The stock wa all wId ld and the Ih I he amount used u ed In III n 1 ore oft a I on oil the ii stall set Itt tIIu till the tort n of or It 1101 1111 voe j 0 fM U t ed I n t t he e C that ware never n I paid PU hi i Ih I h em one on re for presented teti by h l the i t com pal pai PillY y Tin TIll widow vId application cation to 10 the court lo It 14 have hUI hii ye the tho ther r 1111 nl n i iut set apart to 10 her IWI and lua II child chilli an a It under nn an ip 11 of or 2 a The Tho he court Ii il Ihl t I i Ii petition It In u U uti t li lorn of tho tim wro till tho th older carried Into ef e Ct U WAS MAS SOrD In Tn 1 I T the tho property set allart ns os oso n n o Ii tO IIII wa Willi wold ItI it by Ii tho UI o o r 11 1 p It and ih I II h 1 baut filed fi II with rIt Ii the tho III court that t probate tte 1 I I bo le t eo un o Id 1 l on 01 llio I ho Bround that hulL further fill 1111 assets lI I been ft reI ii had IIII I 11 cumo Ci 4 Into tho ii of or the willow widow and tool that I Iho thy ho bills by b thi th rl t lie I of nr the amount over the amount of or tho Iho th tion or 01 22 f Thu 1 It court lurt d 11 t the th und un the tho appeal follow folIos d dIn 1 In III till thu opinion Chief Justice Mc Ic t n o y the th appellant ti i JeI UI n t claims cut i us that t I ti Iho tho If decree leeree dec the th property for fiu tho ho I use ue UK of r DIP t in widow wi vI dol ft child chillI Ch I 11 did tI not Invest itie t to tho the hut their hAir Ih lr to lu i tho t h e amount o n cn n t of tho t he exemption i xin t lo ii giving the tho widow nn l child 1111 1111 the IIII II hl ti tu occupy the th Home samp until u lt Rt valio VItt be hI IH than Z u when tho t he ease I IU a should itt be 10 b reopened et and nUl till IMP t n neX co eX CN applied on till the of tin the de sic deceased ceased rill Pil thi th opinion holds h t r fl IteI i untenable ton i and n nit It lisi u L It n the tho t he ii 1 U of or U the lh t Ii lower I r court COO rt Is III tu ut a I iiii with I Lii costs |
