| Show PARISIAN COURT STIRRED 1 WHEN LABORI TALKED Pails 18 to In today today day df presented to 10 tho Iho court COUIl the timo of the lie husband huband in the divorce milt milL brought 11 iii n this Iii city Cit from Mrs M A Hurt Hart McKen against Mr Tho Th Ural bearing of f time tho caso took Look place March 4 when Mrs Aim through her hOl I described de dlo scribed curtain certain alleged Indignities to which silo she had luau beon been by her hor husband Today Labori mode made counter of a II moat m lt character u the wHo and du do dodl dl Nd that If it the court a I dl di orco It should hould pronounce In favor flor of or tIme the defendant and amid not In favor of or tho ho plaintiff Mr Mme II Iel Is 18 a 11 daughter of oC George AV sv Baxter flaxter of Sho Sun wo Was IM tie the of or Husli HII Perle at itt tho the Into of ot I her marriage to In Mr Jr McKee In Iii Phila Philadelphia 1 delphia In iii January ry 1905 DOl 11 La 1 Labolt bolt borl declared that hILt Mr 11 McKee married Mrs Mis 11 to savo jav her honor He lit men mentioned also nl an Italian marquis ILS q a co cn respondent The allegations of Mr McKees cruel cruelty cruelly ly ty I to 10 his hla Imi child timid and tho ho flagrant wrongdoing were dented and then theil In iii support I of or tho contention that Mr I r should II h receive lie thu decree ot of divorce Maitre Labor proceeded to tu Mrs Irs alleged career while she was still Mrs He lie coupled her noma with that of Loud Lord L ld rind Ummil declared that HU shim Mr McKoe worn WHO at a n hotel two illo lifer afar they th met nu I for tho Iho ho husband declared that his had luul paid M IR bill hili amounting to If Bh she WOH In intile tile thu M of mt amid to disprove the Hie of nr him h his ln Hint I t during ml n mm mal gist hud bud HM 1111 nt t W on toe for his bite wife trite |