| Show NO PROMISE MADE TO ABRAHAM RUEf Francis J Heney Honey Sums Up His Side of Case in Words BOSS PREPARED CONTRACT Special infused to irant Immunity l Affair Upon Cllon Their Motion i em San tan Francisco March 10 A voluminous cue ous affidavit comprising about 1000 words was tiled me In Judge de lie department of ot tho the superior court this thi morning by Ast fist Ally Atty AU Francis 3 J ilene Helle It I Is 18 In answer to tn previously presented by the tho attorneys for tal the In their efforts to have hwe havethe tho the Indictment of oC Abraham TInt for tor bribery annuled chiefly on tho the ground lound that Huot had been promised Immunity by b tho time prosecution Honeys asserts In substance NO P PROMISE MADE That was waa wal never promised com corn complete photo Immunity from punishment but was Wa given gen to understand he ho must ac accept accept accept sentence for tor extortion that It was wag expressly stipulated that no request for tor leniency would be bo made mao by tho the prosecution in the time extortion case cas unless Knots testimony proved to be bo of ot as 3 much benefit to UM the t state stab as an Huer rep represented represented resented It would bo be and Id unless wIleS Runt Ruef furnished corroboration for It I that Su Suo Wilson and anel Gallagher ap approached Runt Ruet at at the Little LIUo St Francis hotel and discussed immunity with wih him without the knowledge knowledg or authorization of ot Dist Atty Langdon Lgon or Honey leney HOW RABBIS DS GET GE IN I That Rabbi Nieto declared decar that tat he lie believed Runt Huet should receive some pun punishment PUI for tor his crimes and that ho lie with Heney that tho the district at attorney attorney torney torne should the to power to sea sen sentence tence tonee Ruet Huet at any time it if I flue tailed to keep his Agreement that thal the tho on en entranCe tranCe of ot Rabbis Nieto and Kaplin into tho the case was nt lit lt their own suggestion and Initiative that net Ruef himself pre prepared pm pared pard a draft of proposed d immunity contract which Heno absolutely absolute re rc fusil fused CU to consider that Henry HenrI Henr Ach Ac and Rabbis II Nito and amI Kaplan hold several seventh secret ecret t conferences with wih members of ot the prosecution in s office ADMISSIONS An BY ACH That Henry Henr Ach freely admitted Ruef had no ice chance to escape conviction In II some Home of ot the e bribery briber cases and urged his client ciletti to 10 accept the time best bet he ho could get from the prosecution that Ach Aeh declared decla ed to honey Heney that Reef Ruef would Implicate certain big bg people in lii big of which the prosecution had no knowledge and amI specifically I cal I mentioned the tho to names of oC Calhoun Ford FOId and 11 Herrin le Ill 1 that thu tho midnight meeting with Judges and Dunno was sug suggested suggested U ested by b Rabbi Kioto and that no to dismiss cases cao against Hue Ruet HueW was W jurist that the tho jurg Judges were simply asked lI their usual policy polley In Iii regard to t cases against defendants who had hiI turned states evidence and Il were el gum as a to their In Lang Langdon Langdom don dom and honey Heney lene FEARED rEARED lI That hat the habeas corpus proceedings to determine the tho legality of ot an elisor elsor Shill were dismissed because feat fear feared ed cd ho would be killed kled by hired assassins of ot the tue It if placed In cus cius custody tody tu tod of ot Sheriff and ana withdrew his petition to avoid this possibility that Runts first frt statement to Burns Barns sup supposed posed to bo be part hIatt of his confession conCession was waa WI false falsI that informed ed tho the news newspaper newspaper paper men the day he that i he expected to t servo orvo u a L term in prison I that Heney refused to have havo anything a I further to 10 do O with when convinced ed el that tho the latter was lying and that Honey Heno believed that George Keane In itt Informed formed emmetT of ot Hues agreement with tho the prosecution |
