Deseret Evening News | 1908-03-06 | Page 4 | Labor and Law

Nn i We Vc Ve c recently tho the attitude of ut Mr Ir Hearst In defending the deem deci decision doll sion ot of the tho Supreme Court when wh n It II held 11 that boycotting Is Illegal Immediately thereafter the thO dispatch dispatches es elf announced that over the thic signature of ot Samuel nn no editorial In the thc for this month attacks tIme the th recent decision of tho tire Su premo Court ot of the United States In tho Iho case of ot Co Cu popularly known as ns the tho hut limit case which Is de dl declared dared ti tl to bo be the most drastic I and nn decision which It has hits ever handed clown down and as Ia affecting di dl directly nil labor and hence tho the whole lh le people tt tl Is noticeable however that the tho current lime lena of or the tho th omits tho tito usual U ual we lye dont patronize list II lit hut but Instead a u paragraph at the thc end ot at tho editorial declares it should bo ho h horne home In mind there thero re Is ts no law aye nyc not even a Il court decision compelling union men old amid the friends of ot labor to buy naming time the particular articles articie which form torm the tho basis of ot the tho Supreme Court decision V We se e would advise labor leaders lea ers to drop irol the tho boycott Issue and to tho the boycott spirit At t best bost It II ItIs itis Is nn an unfair and underhanded way ny of punishing an tan adversary and nn wo we be bc that It reacts upon and finally dually Injures the tho cause caUS of organized labor