Show I HS ADVICK I John Juhn D Jr who It Is II Inters inlet In Sunday school work w rk Is I salt said to luje tout told toll a ii I class that thul It lit hi I very vary wrong to in lomb lend anyone an yo no oven 0 1 ox ex copt on out good security anti and with ide ducts That Is good business doctrine hut but It IL J IH is II claimed that It Is the tho of ot tho Scriptures Scripture This Thin is iii not true te Tim Thu Scriptures dens u IL hue lino between u a U reasonable reu Profit and extortion In II tho time of ot titi tho the l urd rebukes tho tile sloth slothful fill ful ul servant who whim faIled to his Is max inns mUI hers property where it I would woul havo hav brought usury t III 20 26 27 1 At Atthe Atthe the came Ime unto time our Savior time tho extortion that wn was wa practiced anti 1101 I 11 tol as lB the law ban Give to very that asketh of or th thuu and of tf f him him a 11 uy thy goods Bk luk them not 1101 n agaIn aln Ix Love ve ye ya your youri i cEnIe i ml m 8 dp tip d treed and lund bend for tor jiggle 6 Thin higher law WOUl our promulgated ed Ott 1 u it n a 1 to 10 the ul ol UteS 1 13 the hIts law Jaw la of lt Manes this the 11 foi bidden to luke Ilke usury from alit thin lii was WI for tor 11 benefit if ot the upon pour In flu tho the onto of ot stronger u It I In tot aCt wu n p ril Gradually o rl In 1 r how however however ho hoever ever the usury system tem LIO 11 si resulting In Iii Ilia tto literal of Dr tl debtor Thi ThIl Is Old lne j In no language i On the r return tuni tum ut of the tha te nation mom from IU iff iq I leave off of nf title this usury anti 1111 to 10 r to their brethren th y had exacted 1 from ron thoin tham their IUle Ih h their olive olivey oln y yards adl rd AI their h hl huea e also Ilao a hun bun hundredth putt part of or ho lie money and of ot the tho lk orl irn 11 W Dl oil QI N Nob h B 6 m i i tj 16 i 11 11 From which U it I Is evident that when tho the Scriptures s condemn usury 1811 thoy thy refer lo t 1 that exorbitant prica for tor the tho ur urn t of lt t which wan II common c In ancient times time In oriental countries and to which we e now confine LImO lh of or Usury and nd not a R Mr fair fall and reasonable compensation for tOI the O of or the tho sat ln legs s of ot the tM thrifty Mr knows knowl that there tl ro tit Is tita Isa a 1 class ca cia of or Individuals who wl caro C ctr not how they gel got moody money belonging to oth others others ers ens We suppose what ho lie h recant meant to ton wiy tIll n was Wi that it IB he 1 R a 1 ChrIstian duty dut to stop slop a tt t far tar as a possible time tho operations of ot that class cluss it I is tar far better beter to give money to td t the worthy poor por than thun to t place It I at nt the he disposal of ot thieves who POM PO o OJ 05 borrowers |