Show Tin rim SUMMIT Orent Impatience Is lii manifested Rte 1 by IW Ii thu tue th press the tho country nt at tho the decIsion of tho tim District Court of Ap ApI I teals eals In III Francisco on tho tIme Illegal Illegality ity of tho tire Indictment of ot tho tha late Into mayor lIgeno B g It 1 Tire MI decision ro ra reo versed the lower court In many of ot Its Ita rulings and declared that the tIre Indict Indictments meats ments on which both anti and nil his accomplice were welo brought to trial were void YOI I In lii It that tin thoy they fished l to a crime The rime opinion pinion was written by b Justice Cooper Is concurred In by hyth the theother other two I wo we members of ot the tha court Jus Hall Itoh hind Justice Kerrigan J Its Ita effect will be tho thu libera liberation tion lion of nt who may lilY now nos apply to tn bo III iii admitted to Lo ball bail on art the other pending IOn against t him and 1111 Ruef Huor wore uuro ure Indicted for money from houses The rime court holds isolde that tho tire throat threat at on Oil hl h tho inCise U is alleged Il to have born been b n in W WeH not a rt 1 throat threat to do domi mi 1111 III unlawful act It is III pointed out n Ut that tho tire taking avay of ot a ii I liquor li II license 1 cense fn o from n It d for tor Ira lin moral j im tiIs s Is III not an 1111 a ii unlawful I not hut but on eI it tin till contrary t rill a I very 1 proper trot net mid anti a tho the code It necessary Unit thu tire threat bo ho to 10 do un nil nn unlawful a act t tint I Iii Indictment I nit Ic I t is III luia to bo ho null hunt and void Thoro 1 l Is Him siso HII O point p which wall av urged tire tho suffIciency a n tIn Ihl Indictment In III first It does docs not nol show how tutu Hint there ther Wits any un Injury to prop Involved n a Iu f or Ir a n lIcense not miot lining being property III hi tho th strict defini definition tion of ot the tho law In but thU tins point IB is IN 1 over by tM tho justices wino who hole hold tire the fu U on tile this other point If It thin this to Is I the tho law of ut California and atut we suppose It IL Is 18 l no sr fault cap he found with tho the court of ot for Sri de tie declaring claring elating what the lire law lasu In Is I Thu hl tI decIsion I IK Is yet vol In to IJo bo by b tIne tha court of ot tho tiro Stute Borne sume the th tear t that the Iho and 1111 oven ovon Huot lu lisa lise h mn yet et 10 iio soot free Hut tubs Ihl U Is only ou anti n II mo 1110 tire tile extortion onna unit 12 It If itts ts indictments lIls niA ruta dismissed d to gain hU iris hi lib libony ony orty ho Ito will have to 10 furnIsh ball on o forty other othar amounting 1 11 nil to bonds I or cash cn h If It tho the live IIvo extortion Rust are to gain Iris hili liberty hl M will have to furnish bull hell on cnn UT ItT other othir 1 amounting to bond or Of oa CAW c i |