| Show WALSH TALKS ABOUT HIS CASE Speaks of the Jurys Finding as The Tue Verdict and Alleged Findings of Fact Fact SURE WILL BE EXONERATED Very VelY Certain That Case Will I Not Stand Test of ot by hy it tr r tIm thu Nations highest t Court Olt Chicago Jan 20 OThe Tho Tribune today tOlo tOlosa says saja sa Pal For tho t time since the time downfall or ot his bank two yeara ago John 11 U Walsh consented yesterday to discuss with a newspaperman tho time troubles which culminated last Saturday when a federal court Jury julY adjudged him gUity of or violations of ot the tho national banking laws Incidentally ho he of ot the tho Jurys julYs an as nl the ho verdict Hu Ho HoIt IB iii It confident the tho Jurys alleged of fact fiet will vili wi not stand slad tho the test of oC re review review view by tho the Jurists of ot the highest court and timid that ho lie will wi yet yot bo ho from nil ni charges chares made modo him Mr Mi II Walsh spent the tho day da at nt tho the Giand Gand Central depot dep t transacting ar arrears rears of at business for tho the enterprises in which ho Is Interested How flow to earn Interest for fol depositors working their money through Investments is lit a I matter mater which 1 I be hc believe behove hove lieve leve these jurors from tho the country districts never nevet took Into 1110 consideration tion ton he Bald auld It I Is up to tho the president prell dent ilent ns as the tho chief executive of ot tIme the modern big bank to decide the merits meris soundness of ot tho tIm available Invest Investments montH ments mUlti mid securities If I the tho president makes a mistake it is a I matter of oC Judgment his bad judgment and he ha should not ot bo be accused of ot Intention to defraud unless there is no other way to explain his acts net This was Wl tho the crucial point in my m case tho question of ot my ray Intent In making the tho Investment In tho the railroad securities There hero was al nothing In the tho case to contradict my testimony that I Imade made the Iho larger Investments to save lave time tho Chicago National bank from losses lossel I Ion on tho the original small email Imai investments I Imade Imade made good In that effort and anti I can Cn cannot cannot not understand how the Jury jUr reached Its Is that I intended to defraud the tho Chicago National bank from losses on 01 tho the original small Imal In Investments Investments vestments I made good In that effort efort and I cannot understand how the Jury jur i reached cached Its strange conclusion that I 1 Intended to defraud the tho Chicago Na National tonal bank bankI ban banI I 1 am not admitting that I violated time the 10 per cent limit or if I did I ocr certainly Cr did dil not know Irow It It It The bank got the tho bonds for tor security and that they were wel good security and ld not worthless has been proved by t tho tte e fact act that the Iho leading banks of Chicago have pur purchased purchased chOsed chased them at par Pi I It is well wail W known however howe that the tho tl 10 per cent limit has hos never been enforced by b action aeto in the courts and In practically all al banking circles It was wan wal regarded as u tL I dead let lot letter letter lotter ter It I may have been ben an ideal law at tho ho time of its Is passage many years ago ag when banks and their t oh transactions were small email However I hold that the memorandum violate this tm law mw bond transaction did not |
