OCR Text |
Show fc- -- . - - ,,,1 irKrafi--r ff ii-1 ii"-- - - - i - - - - Zzz. . . . . tUSOD'S ITJEECIILV' GOC3EI3V GUIDE p 'ill rSfc . VV' At 26tlk 1:; H33 Prizes - Free Music - Bowling Passes Sumo Wrestling & The Dating Game Lip-Sync Contest $5 per entry 1-5 people $1 extra for each additional contestant. mill mm Letters to the editor Prayer doesn't violate rights as much as stifling, belittling To the editor, This letter is in response to Tiffani-Danielle Toyn's letter of last week, in which she claimed that "prayer would violate others' rights." That assertion is, without question, the biggest bunch of taurine solid waste material I have ever heard. Prayer does not violate the rights of others. Stifling, belittling or preventing prayer violates the rights of others. Tiffani asks, "I have faith, and do not believe in any God; therefore, why should I have to be violated and annoyed?" Good question. Of course, a believer might ask, "I believe in God and have faith; therefore, why should I have to be violated and annoyed at her godless ideas?" Same question, just from a different perspective. Tiffani, don't accuse other people of having a "lack of respect for other's views." Some might say that you're as guilty as they are. She also asks, "Haven't you ever heard of separation of church and state?" The opposite question is, "Have you never heard of freedom of religion the right to practice any belief without interference from the government or anyone else? Whatever happened to that?" It is gone. Or at least going. 'Freedom of religion' is hard to find in this country anymore. It is being replaced by 'freedom from religion.' The government has gone so far in trying to protect the rights of those who don't want religion, that the rights of those who do practice religion have been limited. Even if a group of people decide unanimously among themselves that they want to pray at, say, a town meeting, they are prohibited from doing so. That is not separation of church and state. That is subjugation of church by state. She then says, "Religion doesn't make the world go 'round." Historically speaking, Tiff, you are dead wrong. Ask your history professor. In short, the letter was inaccurate, biased and downright ridiculous if one looks at both sides of an issue. Now, lest I be misunderstood, my point. I am not saying we should mandate prayer in public. But I don't believe we have the right to prohibit it either. So there is one issue I agree with Tiffani on: it should be a matter of individual choice. P.S. Oh, and about Tiffani's threat to respond to prayer with profanity, I have two words: NO CLASS. Michael Martin WSU student Letters to the editor The Signpost welcomes letters to the editor. Letters should not exceed 350 words. Letters must include name, address, phone number, relationship to staff and the signature of the writer. The Signpost reserves the right to edit for reasons of space and libel and also reserves the right to refuse to print any letter. Bring letters to the editorial office in UB 267 or mail to: The Signpost, Weber State University, Ogden, Utah 84408-2110. Attn: Jeff Haney, editor in chief. 5SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS IE? r&Kii. '.-'V 'aSiffe . w- Silodium College Rings IRTCIKVED sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss , ; -1 v v |