Show NELSON BLAMES Says She OfficIously Offensively And Unwisely Intermeddled In Case SAYS SHE WAS A BUTTER IN itil It hits tt B Welt eIt Its In limit Hut lm rr David A elson whoso whose wit Nelson made mallo charges ot of cruelty aGainst tint him I III ii her hel divorce act hors ii led lii III till court last tOlla today tiled its hIli answer to the complaint In which hu its every against hint him by his wile After Atter taking each allegation to III time tho tutu denying It In toto the tho ot of snakes the tha follow tollow ng allegation as to time tho cause causa of oC the tho being him hilts Ie 10 further that ito ho line lIall nl al Imy treated luau tiff lii a ilium nor er 1111 Its mill affectionate and ho mo alleges nut lint title this suit stilt by tho thio ot of alit Is the result of hr r pernicious that his suit wits WIlli for Cor the sole o ot of vexing und tic dc t anti Injuring his good III It his position as n teacher In the schools of oC Salt elt City I nS DENIALS Mt Nef Neron denies that hat lie he spoke to his Ire ite Or toll told her to shut ir mouth while they were on thou their tour In Portland lie he denies that their M ItO commenced it 11 item SS tem em of abuse towards plaintiff Or that ho 10 over ever called her a liar or a sneak or r imor hur ot of being deceitful or orvar ever var told her that ho he wits was sorry that li ial her lIe Ite denies most em emphaticallY that lie he ever Use profane profaner or r abusIve towards her hor or hat lie he In 1111 any other thai thau that of oC a gentleman In iii every respect m WAS NOT lIe denies that Imo he became violently ingry while they were ero out bUlgy rid 1 1 Ing rig and canto camu very tr nearly tipping his cIte out of oC the tho buggy lie He aIs that hat he ever called plaintiffs mother mether metheran an old hag or told her that she plaintiff up anti carted curtell her alt 1111 over ver town to tf try and amid catch on to a 11 lie He denies that thal ho ever threatened to leave plaintiff but admits to the tho and engaging a 11 oem lie He declares that ho he that MrM Nelsons molher hind been vcr cry dIsagreeable to him and Ito ho pro pre not to hive IIvo with her to go to the hotel to live IIvo with Ith him but nt at she to lIo do so 0 Thu Tho next day site she to KO go with rith lila him The rhoy afterwards lookout tor or moro noro rooms but being unable to had them defendant returned with his Is wife to la her home WENT BACK TO MOThER 1 0 T rhey afterwards secured II a house here thc they liVOLI until Oct 2 1906 hien It Is alleged nile soli plaintiff heft leet end went ent back to her snottier mother Defendant that she hati no cause what over ver for tor leaving huts him Prior to their last July Mr r Nel on alleges that hll he hUll had told plaits plain Lit that he desired to live JIve aloOf alone bo be stile cause mother had and unwisely with their affairs and that the defendant thought they should not on that tic lIe live with h her r parents alter their thell After they were married lie ho hon n aln expressed II a desIre to live IIvo by anti furnished a suitable lace for tor them to Ilvo which without or reason loft leU and liming during absence mike her hor moth noth nother er took oil the books book nil away front time the place Dy Dyher her or action has and do de defendant without Just cause causo causer or r reason Defendant asks that her for tor divorce be |