Show JUVENILE COURT SUGGESTIONS The Juvenile court or of thIs city will Till when the Legislature meets In Janu undertake to secure tIto Iho passage or of four measures Thor They are as follows I FirstA In law providing for tor the tho sep separation of IJ toy lY nit Kid girt Inmates of tM tho unto school S A law to C camp compel r parents f whose chIldren are committed to tn tho Industrial school to pa PM a 1 portion 0 the or of their there It If n able le to do so with 1 a vie view to f reducing th co cost 1 to the 1110 state of run 1 lag Iho t he I Institution istl tu I lot law to provide for tim Ih pun of who abuse ron COO trIbute to the tho delinquency or of their chit I of a chool for mInded or IdiotIc dill ii ret Ot Of the wisdom of for tor tim or of the bo boy and girl Inmates ot of the tho retort reform school there can hI be question There should hould not only onh ho ot of the tho but institutions In it differ dUter towns o arrangement could bo be worse than to keep tho lie Inmates In th thame the santo ame school nil all ore are sent them thern tI ot t Ii ir criminal tendencIes to permit then to 10 assocIate manner what whatever hot ever I b to encourage those tendencies The Tho of the tho second sus aug tc Is 18 very en doubtful The State has absolute control over oer thoo sent to the reform school the same amo as It has those sent to the and for tor forthe the tho saute reason rason yet no one would eVer think of compelling parents or of prison Inmates to contribute to the tho expense ot of Ih lr Tho Iho solutIon for tor forthe the problem In eIther casa Is II I Ito to compel reform school and In Inmates I mates alike to 10 defray their expense to the State by labor In the Case or of re reform form torm school inmates this is II not quite so ns as In III that ot of convicts but they could ca easily lIy ho bo mado by their labor to contribute what probably would under the Iho Juvenile court suggestIon bo be ex cx acted of the tho parents A parent cannot bo be held responsible for tor the torts ot of a achild achIld child nor Its crimes then why hold the tho parent for tor It Its maintenance when the tho State has hall ot of It t III as an embryo embro criminal t to the tho thIrd suggestion who abuse their children or who Tho con contribute tribute to their criminal delinquency should be held responsible No 0 one will that but there them Is Isn Isa n a danger In the tho enactment or of such Ii a 11 law a as I Is hero here proposed It Is II that the right to chastise II a child wIll be taken front the vacant To the scott mental any correctIon of 1 a child b by n a 13 parent nt Is The Tho probable ro re antI or of the enactment Into law lit of afi h ha a 11 suggestion as 81 Iii Is made by the tho Juvenile court Is well Illustrated b by the story ot of the tho boy bOT whose condu conduct t became SI go out s lU and insulting lint his hll father I nt at last him bin and told b by bythe I the tho h buy th that L he would hM have hlo A Ati ho was ns pulled d attil I given ten days In jail This proposed 11 law would put tim Ihn State ira In loco boo paren parentie I tI tie there being altogether too great II a I to tn make the State supreme us as against the tho parents In the Iho matter ot of of r a family Tho third of the tho Juvenile court cannot be The suggestion feeble feebleminded minded rind idiotIc children is II a very er goo good one It If a school Is III the simply feeble minded l be from the tho purelY Idiotic both being und under r the tho care and super supervision vision or of competent alienists The suggestIons as a whole lire are along the rJ rIght bt line anti writ worth the tho care tul UI consideration ot of the tho |