Show COURT COURI oTES for In hit the he court by Carrl Hummel against Hummel on tho ho grounds ot of It and failure to support They wore I In III this oilY city on No ov 6 h 1942 1902 and have oni on child nt which plain Bilks asks the cu custody lob She Sho nl nio o for tor 25 per fr alImony and IO lIS as at attorneys tees fees mill and costs coMs of oC suit The tIC at H 11 1 agaInst Jsmes Jamel A Luke stud and C K t W wail ed itt at Plaintiffs cost h by JUdge yesterday upon 1 a lion ion plumed b by the to no action The Tho suit sull wait brought to III recover SIO IGI on t a bond bon 1 In till an stilt tiled In COUrt COUrtat at Murray UPon ullon which aumi 1111 Stans Stansbury tans bury rendered in III ot of and amid held th wall waa wrong wrongfully tulI fully has Issued II ed suit eu time The jury In the he case calle ot of John F loll WIfe against lI ber ani which was tried lii In Judge Lewis court hns II a In favor ot of for tor the sLim or of nil api damages unit nOlI III as attorneys tes evs The rhe actIon sas brought to recover dim ages for tor Injuries caused to plaintiffs I orchard buildings on t a tract ot of hand leased by hem to 10 Time Tho I the d failed to 10 comply the terms ot of the I Ie lease ue lii In keeping the hull buildings lInga In good condition and in III stork slack from Crom the orchard and as a result the property or of was damaged In Inthe the sum stated above |