Show INTERVENTION INTER COMPLAINT Ii lest In lI 1 Li lit III mu i ieti I en I ut utA A In has been tiled lied In Iii the Iho district court In the re case o by Johll and III other her against Ih the I n B I hey Jl If H l 1111 U iii I Forbes the e the Iho bent ot of a 1 tor or th company compan The Iho intervenors arc 1110 th tim company ot If the Iho lii In HilI or at Aln holh of which pro h hiLy Cled of the company The company Is a 11 creditor ot of thu Iho company In the nuin Kum of the Iho company In a 11 creditor In the Mint ut of complaint In Intervention iii al that the implement Is IB not Insolvent that It Ju hll Hot been bien by Mr Jt it eon contends tends Ihl there I ts no of Ihl extra expense lit tt ot of it II that tha Ihn In the tho sire nol hot entitled to 10 the Iho rell relief f fought of oC n a 11 nil eller eIer It II III Ia res II It In III giant Ilent injury II to the credit of the tho 1111 company A of Ih tue trouble Is III oil b by tit in I t Johll Q chlo he be a Itil of th tue for a 1 ot of one year 1111 which time limo It Is In thought that the 1 or of the Iho lIIn pan VitO ho be lIt III inn IK nt at 1 it ot of Mc Ic ornick ro o the tue l s hunk i tho ho International lc itil 1111 or at are of the 1111 ment It I I Willi that the ot of Mr Ir he be itt Ht 20 ItI 11 th iI Ir r rJ lili lo t will i III lie h tr Ir a nd 1111 ii ii lid I leory ory board or of lives of the thc lAthe JAko banks the Inlet nod I a third hy by the Iho to thus unit I ter r will he b by Judge e eon on morning the order to cuttie e will I Ic |