| Show f SCION mN Of d CITY COUNCIL Viaduct Proposition Voiced Vetoed and anda a Again in the Hands pf pfd of d The Committee l AFFAIRS OF WEBER COUNTY ur I n Ock A tinner It Humm n Holl r T Ti o AS i I 24 2 In ln l last t nl ht lie ea eaI I ih It council counell lI th the Twenty i t viaduct cameL came ame amet x 1 joliS form forma and the entire L t II i IM i now In the hand bend of ot ev tev l 1 In It Ile original form p f i III Illy hi mayor vetoed the tin ordinance or d i I week icK ego ago because e he believed I 1 nJ Id d company should maintain i I 11 1 In to the th I Thi 11 v veto to Ni l I iti tT i a 8 read from General iV W V U H Bancroft or of the Oregon i in which h hI the for friT the r re T norm on that the tho Ih r rell ll upon lIpon ti I to one i surface in r of th tilt t Later Idler i 11 II for n a frai hlee e was wait WR wasby i by the thi I f p i This Thill I n II I i of Or Ili Ih il TH that t knit hill ih Ili roadway t coin 01 im only ly lh he il II i ait 1 After I 1 ns v readings reading the then n i ern nl to th tI la It v streets i ni fI Ic Null mill flit II i nullify 11 I or alIt avit n 8 to toi I i dl th the t complaint had hadl hadI I l hy h n It large number of i ui III Mocking blocking ini f 1 viaduct alto It by th the i n and that a 1 special officer r be b appointed t tn the city ordinance cp In thin Ihl reaul mayor mYOr w 11 wee to 10 nth at one on The auditor report d that thaI h h hud hod d I bem n nak ak asked 11 4 by the et to tn audit th the boon book look of or th h treasurer claiming that the th present nt r had refused n ed to mule nak uk out an en il tat went ment at of all ail bUI transacted 1 to date datt Council Connell Instructed the h r to tn fW fur furnish nish U bt h his successor I Ue the th nt called AN tw |