Show COLORADO FEu FUM In lu ewe Kull U Ml b II bI hY I 1 mi u It lu 0 Pled Mining II Iii haa ba g til i r i u a i m Hi I la e Sted aca ull ullI i I I ph I 11 use HUH of the th tn In n tar IIII of the ih h original t IMI 1 I Is ih tilt of tit of a aport portion ion of 01 the bun sow by b thai Ihrl M w M w 1 ui up the Ih claim alm that thai he lie U la en h I lurd il 1 Mir 1 tea tear r i i MI II h i I k ur r th the h Patel 1011 I 1 n iv o 1 i lIhi W l u It I II I wu I 1 ii time or t Ih ll 4 d 1 Hi tI II t I iJU chars hu but buff f r rI fi thlu i hi hla number or N u Than tIba ha he b of r thai hat to In n the tta lb 10 1 a but bill the Ih 1114 nr 11 denlo that I 1 en enI ml I I l I hate hart ha lur Ud l u I lu U r ruck fui t f lh Ih the o a r wt t forth in ii the th an that Iba t he h sold old nr n hi bl tock cluck tu to II thor other peron until un III he h had only fc 6 tow fow w more mOle than thun left lefi The Theil shares bare were WI wiped out according to the thc answer anwer In u a duly dul advertised sal ale for I the hi n that the th a haj hw not nul been paid At a u meeting the capital Mock Ma was all Increased from to lu l 0 share hale s In L 1 hu his complaint alleged that he h had had no no notice not Gee tice t of a Ii meeting which took lonk place piece pi on March 20 two 1000 In lD the complaint complain I the tha th thIe date data Ie 1 Is axed at March 10 W The answer aller soya the company does doc not nol know whether th Ih the plaintiff had gad notice nolle of thin th meeting or 01 not but INI allege that thai It waa wa addressed to him through the tilt mall mail and already In a dally daily newspaper In bit It Lake The defendant company say MY ayi II It 1 refused to deliver th the shares hare to Iv Wn when hIli 1 h he e d de m nde l them thorn The Tb manner mariner In which I Is al alleged al lo lu have of the Ih holdings holding In Colorado are set net forth In detail One hoe Item Itam Include ll ah tare hare to III l Pt t Mark Merka Markh hospital h To Dr W Y Croxall the dottor doctor who attended him he h b gave t 10 OUO share hare A further and nd pertinent al cl n I II that 09 01 Nov U n l I IN M dUr l d l In n 0 nM W a K i O In f t enumeration o i n of MO T Two thou thousand hU sand Mild hari ha 11 were fOri of ot to Wil William 11 liam W It I Ii Ie alleged The defendant dd allege all that bat the plait plain plaintiff tiff tia at t 1 the lb tune lime of nf th the levy lev and nd later latr latron on the th lat of r sale nip 1 owned oDI only 1131 1114 I which In III the h n r and nd under I amended ankle s were u I sold nt et public Ole hale I The Th corporation took talk Hie II It ef I 1 IThe The fet 1 tin tun ahaN to toI I or cy IK I i I hey hav been bean made mad by reason f the failure 0 of to IQ Stay say it a not mole i iTh Th The an anner ei eel ei III forth that thai the In r rec of the lit tI i stock to k did not ant q 11 of runt fot the ml save In that the tile hare wre liu hn r nd and HIU made and able aMe but blot t K P U la I 1 by the Colorado company 0 that th Ih value of ot the ual uel har hr h ti I iii I i 1 b any pron war were I in I n roue I IThe The c t ah of the to an en anwer enaver n nr aver preys r Y the Ih i our url urt that t In the plaintiff I have bay nothing und and that the have lIay tort NII I |