| Show fiGHT ON fOOD TRUST fRUST It Contains Many F alu Fa Familiar In the tha Salt Uko Luko Situation CHARGES BY HY THE STATE ry 6 t Ae u lire M a Huff hr wr MMe t hj t Urn M M i In eN Ni situ 1 t l lt t 1 i f f i Molt tt take lake la li I Interested In the tho Uon of the mv Fr Petra t I tr t tt t tIB r 5 IB r l FN V 8 tr f And nd n t I for far the h MW 1 IP I that tat t j tk Retail HaU Merchant In Halt II IIi It i t III but a n 1 ew of or the th Mer Mr Index Jr published at st J and j Ilse r Ial organs or a nf iva h are linked with other combine In nn II U the principal American If t caws Item t f the th Retail Ran Met M Mt t In Salt BaU f au Lake forn MI the bash th tin the air marls made here her h again l t the theand tb then n and nd butcher flashy finally d JUI Jury action The news newa Item ferns f fb s Me Index formed torm the I Ifor 1 fur for d charge b In m Denver Denier ent r I M as a foi tol an tn the tit trust of ot n an on In tn Into Into Ion to determine whether one our ourN I N the tell tale talc caution print pant d tit NN Index which now nn firm the thO thOre re for th the en Mss MIN in hI court the goods good protected by agree fut t out all e far aa es all by A The TIt in la I very to th the one Lore n to Jensen Jeneen defended here heir to re N reporters porters tilling during the flat few fw week wk of ln with hIm and aad to his hiM work price rutting to lender UK as he h explained ned It iti The Th p rt i e e of 0 the h P Den Denver ver r earn tamo In tor for and andU U In Denver Do end nd the thc defense defence Mr tur It was waa wa Ih In name ante Mine an as that thai ad advanced advanced herr here In Just that thai It Il was waa wasa a social octal committee In to I OJ spread Inform Information tion and nd nut fix price i es esThe The The argument of the Colorado attoh JM by bv which he hr h sought ought to convince the rout root t that thoi th r existed a atral contain the tho following follow lug para 1 i IOn convince In r the tb tI said Bald lit he h there exists a MII Ih h m as 11 la Is In III the complaint anti HIU prayer n iyer Mr I And 1 I will 11 show h i It trout from facts tach gleaned gh aued from fron the II of t these theae th re respondents Hindi FIrst I t Ill say nay that the th retail grin cm of ot are Ii I member of the Gt nver Ora em era amo 0 or 01 of ot one on or the th other oth r local In Colorado second aon that the Retail association la Is lamade I Imad made mad up of the een local loral bodIce bodle through the Ih tart fart 1 that the th president pral president dent and secretary fir ut if each Ih are aie 11 mem mm ben bera be third that the th n louil loul i H Ii rating nil I UK bunk book with witha a tI list of Prot rt d fourth that the said Mid lIt Hat of or protected prot td arU l a U is I by the tho turner I local to the publication m commute committee of ofu thu u Mate Gate fifth that the state Mate mw raHon th lh i sched schedule bPd hed ule of price In III a journal known an ac a tin the l erchant Index sixth thus hut the th I In mild cud protected en are ar d t liy by the th retail dealers dealer a c Hi that it If the Ih pr e eI eI I not nol maintained the Ihl retell retail dealer rail can cannot not nol purchase any more mono article eighth that the th article by bv th tI oho re rp retail tail dealer are Bre bought through the th dealer or the th Jobber and It II Itla III la I the th latter who whit hu rofu to In unk s II are maintained main These Theme eight fax ras t dim los loa the xi xieu e eu ice of a V e hao IIII on nn ill illa A a J 3 H rk out outa r t at a I george orge sends send out oUI cardI cardIe ard rb e the retail wade ad on Oil sugar but bUI pleading In defense that It ft Is ls I a i r fir mil rul HIGH J Ea IH 1 AlL AlLI T 1 I ha have hilI o hi hn here ie a i c I f t Hi Ih tt Mi ti M i Index a lIt hut of or offers of or tl Ih the Denver Dearer ces an ant l ltd Among these theN la Is the price commit committee tee tse I with r C aa as chairman Red n dish la Is luId somewhere In n the hook bonk aa as II nay I in that a new price will witt have hI to In be bf made mot on nn MenI ini Ml tir 11 bp be br bec c cause ua the th rud t lit it ij II i Then follows ollo H II Ilet II I of fir pra i aIs it ii non n 11 nt t lining u 11 in h item UK is IO pi 11 1 I k i MI a cof coffie Iott fie fee t ph t il ug r arid and t n v of r I j which h sr III actual m clot f III the M M I i f I I IX I X in an that Kur Kum 1 na ns I sag have to 10 h M he sot oM fI fIan I II u fit it i i ican xo cans can an f for i n a quart 1 UArt i l i I i u II j I a Ine lb i iK x I Ithem I Ithem them has haJ h o h I 1 11 II red 11 II I oj i that they w ji it r n r v P I I i but that he II i n a i t I Mate tea of pried price I IOn On Oft May 4 t the Ins Ini Ints x tag Ug of ot May Hay 2 saying it tt t ili H t t c j points poi to be lIP tabled d for ro g ca r w i cut at by Mr fro Reddish who tatt J of at th Ih the tai a ano K had been attracted to 10 tN the DIm Denv u mind and that they the have aw De Den Den n the th front rank They reel feel r that no for fir the ar t tIn K rn ran In hardly be to It THE tn OFFICIAL I I Attorneys Altom for tor the tha tit l It f Mp to the r reading I ot of f the Uti ledea MI and ltd I t l mm front the tbt status tato as nrc tt le commend Why do o you wl wi h to let shut hat the th ma mo of r n f The TIt ob olt I ti stun n to 10 reading In from frum tin the It index overruled Now Mid eid at Mr Dickson dropp 1 the flit ill 11 hc the b t to T i thaw have ap apol I of hays have h been beel b t I out mit by b the 1 t would wool wo Ilk tn to have tt tit tell th thO the court whit what wh l I ti the I h tt tta I a price committee In n n social org orp n II ration or 01 wh why It IK is nM tn to h ha hUgH ha a UgH sugar i w e Vp We c have she hc i that t the whole sJ dealer and the J i I bet bel refute refine to tr ml srI 1 to 10 the retailer nr m ft MW he h maintain the th He H quoted th than Ihn n he the Ih affidavit of J JK JE I IE E K Roach oath telling how the th sale 0 loaner r of l le vr r hart had refuted refused i r sell ell 11 to tn hum him be bo auae u he h would not man mam lain d The h took t ok exception to this Mila producing ifT i iI davits ln I to haw thAI that th the res r sm on ROa Boa it I t was waa ir denied the i right to to font fr tr m the tho th holt alora and 4 Jobbers Jobber Job war wa r to t tc ate taune c he hf had been through batik bank bankruptcy I proc edings TRUST HIM Who forced hit int Into bankruptcy thundered the Ih attorney general ral It t f the Ih combine that drove him out of 01 buln In II and I 1 will prove It ft when this Ih ass I comes t to trail troll By B their wn n admI th the Denver Retail Grocers l I k bilged to If maintain a fixed of or prices I rl II on certain protect d go goods OMI li or I lose lone 1 the right to deal doal in them by tho II lb manu The Ph dou to burled buried In Inan Inn inan an n affidavit from F P D H N HW Nw W Babcock A J U ck and A AT AT AT T resented D by try b Att AU Ira r l Both erber erberD and nd Iru ini ned ai as a a for tor the of t i eaver who art r charged bj by b All Ati Ally Cf fial Dickson with cooperating with th the food font trust tru lo to l J charge the consumers uC of f Colorado 29 Zit per r cent II more for the necessities ne of life lite than would be demanded In an open I and market markal wait waa the aen sen eh of f the hearing HOW DOES IT ITIn ITI ITIn I In aa an affidavit signed by II John F K Kocho Roch of Fort Fot Collins and nd presented t Iy by y the attorney general It was wa stated that thai Kocho hod had attempted to sell lell ISI IS ISIK I II III IK I und of sugar ular for U 11 1 when the com combine bine hine Ine had hd axed the amount at 14 pounds und all un 1 that thit as a a result he was vas a refused the tin right to buy any more roods prods 0 To till this Ally Atty Att Ralph Stevi Stevens for tt or part par of the combine put putt putU I U t A on the stand and he dented denied emphatically ever hearing vt of f The n in Denver echoes echoe many maIt familiar phrases to Halt leaker Laker who were tn to the crossfire of October and November c charges harg a and replica One Una affidavit was aa as follows A FAMINE George Simonton declared In a forceful affidavit that If It the price of ot oft t Ii I reduced I a per cent aa tie a an amaul n maul uli of the attorney generals general cam am It will put pul the th retailers retailer out of oC hushes und and create a famine In ht Colora Color Colorado do fin Tie He U quoted quod d figures figure to show allow IOV that the alir aler makes little out of aC the handling I j of sugar augar According to his hla statement the Ih average price Irle In 1906 of f beet sugar gar I t wait all per perk SHI tak k of ino I on i pounds and In 1907 f 07 f The Th st 1 he hI wild said IlL hi i ant nt i ut itt 1 h t I dr d rs g by bv the iho th Merchants ai a aeo o 11 i i v w s 9 sly 01 on granulated sugar In March of or this year the Ih profit to the dealer on sugar augar ar wa was w 15 16 per cent ITT CUT UT RAW ItAW MATERiAl Time The only way WH Mr Simonson says aa to reduce the cost of ot hing to la to low lower 10 lower er to the tho price on grain wheat what beets beeta and other raw materials or a to lo cheapen the COM coat of manufacture Igor lor the le year ending Oct Out 1 1907 1901 Mr lr Ir Simonson said rid I that 71 per cent of lit the sugar augar in Colorado was waa made trout from beet bees He cited the fact that since atnee In the of ot the Retail Merchants Merchant association there have been boIen fewer failures failure among monK the th of the tate tale contending that thai better method had been beell In vogue VOW |
