| Show LOWER COURT IS REVERSED IN PAST PART Supreme Iu Court Finds That Low Lowr Ir r Tribunal Did Not Allow Sufficient Rights Right VERSUS I j kit 14 w With IMI o Nii II to io JI aw awon An Mon on In h part the tha theMon tIt Mon OS In the th cue cM ot 0 Johanna obanna tI and t Boren X aM EIsA dt b 14 appel wu w handed down dowa br the tha The la Ie written br y Frick Prick and Md haa h the tk of ot and sd Chief Sue l Jus McCarty In part It II aJa The Involved have ban been before MM Ute wn c In an another Iber turin form M at 3 17 lit Iii the action bring on en J t br te t UI a nal the thi lb defendant n and nil I a bed upon Uj OlI the the IM beM M ery 7 that th upon li on n Which Ut null wan wa bawd bd wa WM by the thu de di defendant BO 80 0 ih IbM IhaL l the th LII might re I It II and be of uS the I ti land And mer ater right the 01 f 1 the Ih contract Tnt This I la Ia denied den the tM plaintiff by b the court and she uhe shet he t w t cue aup ue to 10 recover o el the III pur chili price and nd In tn default 41 to la subject th thu land nd to 10 sale all tie n a fort Hi III 4 IUn 11 r Judgment a entered for fo the pin In Un In ful I 29 6 u j an au the land old oid I In III if payment To this judgment the defendant appeal In It hi confederation of In lb the of the th su court ourt holds that ln Ine trial court burt erred Ird In not n t awarding to toI I defendant C IIII quite quit ail dl U Of the Ibe rIghts right tn to which thiS the Ih supreme court And them In entitled the thc Ih contract CAME l cA K D The ae l I remanded led to the th lb district court with olli to t set el aside aIde Ide tho tha decree and an to modify It Iti finding tu to I permit the defendant to show bow what damages dam s he has h sustained and to allow the to 10 rebut rebuL this claim to 10 require the Ih plaintiff to tonder r the de di defendant d u a prop entitling him tu to 6 HI shares share nt or an all ab abt tract t of title and deed of conveyance and rend to enter a decree that the defend defendant defendant ant anI pay the plaintiff all money mOlley due auf tu and it Jt It II be Patel paid sId within the Ih time set pet et oy oythe j the court the judgment cancelled and otherwise the th promise to 10 tx be mid eold a U as upon execution and the pro proceed applied to 10 the amount found due du the plaintiff with the right richt of a de I judgment The Thi costs cost of the tI appeal are taxed to the th defendant The court does doe d not rv the whole case c but directs the trial court to modify It Its Judgment with respect to cost col and require eat to In i v hit ht hi costs hut but It If a Io stile sale al l Is th Ih shall halt be ord tn 10 t i ty py d nIt nil i RIM of the th sale pate la Ia all ut other othar respects reV t the and antI decree are re pr ed d |
