Show A TIG IDEA OF I Bryan the Ih Theories Held by Thomas Jofferson and NATIONAL INCORPORATION td to Is It M fur rs t t i Im w tt at thell on i I II uk soP U 11 I ia Il J Bryan Dryan wS willi Iii guest of honor I Ith tn th I nf f fJ h I J on Mb P of tSe ely lilt iii t I m t Plankinton S O lIt ht r rr c r laid ft toe for r oval gueSt s t tp II c p nd tw to MM the tB t I Mr fr Bryan IL the tho I Ito k to theory tta of v out lt t bj by b cots It with the Hm Rn they of f Isai i n U 1 In hi I speaking at Spheres of the Ih ni n nI nilion lion Iton I II and aM the Ilia took occasion th n t 1 i condemn the tM f r fIn railroads In M es proposed ed by bt tb lb rr pron i dont savINg eav however the pr Intended It II It t won wan II tn Iii U the Interest of OM railroad odo which d dr Id ed d not creal federal re but bet 0 HI tr Mate te U UH He H iI the th trust tariff taril sod and railroad On 0 the tb trust qu liin utu he hr favored ayo the t nf of ot the th criminal laws law Ia against Inet the Ca and m mIh the Ih of new ne laws law la one Jf f which to known as u a the to 1 be hO applied to corporation corporations when ithon hn they th y control aa as roach much a SS III per vr rint of the total output In their respective tins line net C to this tit system em nn no noone one OM corporation orp would be permitted in 1 control c more m than 10 per vent cent of ot tho thu total product On the tariff tarl he favored tord Immediate beginning with lIh th tariff on article which come com Into Int competition with articles article such Kuch a tariff he h thought ought to t b be entirely removed He believed that the fear Mr of removal would compel the Ih dissolution n of such nuch u trust treats Ir as fill are art protected by the tariff He regarded d da a tariff as U a merely an ex et UIa for delay dal tn to II revision The he pro protectionist he Ii h said oak never ner favor rc ro vision until they arc r re threatened with wit h defeat and then Ihen they favor It only to top p reduction r On the railroad question he ho ed td himself a as In favor of ot more mor aUto stringent gent ent regulation that regulation 10 to 0 take the form of legislation ao m In ins the Ih prent value of the th railroad railroads preventing the watering of stOCk t n k and nd reducing rate He Ht 1 argued arp that a rca roa II enable rate rt would be a rate nIt would enable the railroad tn tt maintain their hell t stock Io k at par when the toad rad 11 1 wax wai a honestly He discussed l the tho th nt money mon stringency saying that It II b in ln with Ith peculation p In New York but UI that It Itha Itha ha extended owing In I time the Ih of ot He HI thit tha I Ihl m lit tini 1 1 was M not ji aol anil thit Ihal the th bank banka of f the th wit t are up sound d II fa Ca fared Cavi vi red rd legislation 1 by ln In r i the of would w i 1 move even an Mt fe fear r Mr Ir Br aT will I J at MJ Mil n early tomorrow t fur f a we wk kH tour lour if r rIh tb Ih state |