Show I lI Ol Ola It to in clamed claimed that there 1 II a a of crI paper In ta this country the ike tion U n se o a as to ta tai apt tk tile the m t r ri r to the utmost It ha bas even n bees bee teeS that thaI of n unanimously call cell for a re repeal peal of duties on paper and nd all material that thai lintel enter talc Ito the manufacture ulM lure ture of tf such inch paper PIt rude Crude paper irtack oIk It rem including and aad other uther pulp woods wood la Is admit admitted ted led fr free u w Wa W d pulp 1 ground I IS dutiable at t the tea I rate of cent per pound and IId chemical wood wad pulp at 11 lt I Lent ant rr reI pound Paper manufacture lures ture not lilt otherwise d and tind wood pulp not DOt otherwise pe ore are ar sub subject u Jut Jett to 10 a duty of M It par per os cent t ad Whether the t repeal o of this duly fluty would kelp help matters may be a que qu lion but It I le certain that there eMra u Is I a s steal deal of or was wast In some w p per Aker If seem ome of our would woul devote the tb span apace now crow taken up tI by br daring headlines headline sea and data demor U picture 11 to 10 now new items Iten a S great groat t dell deal of uI f prating t paper could ouM 0 be saved raved v IC If w addition tIon they would 0 make It a rule nisi r to II print post Ik Wilt truth only there Them t would wo to be a as nc of 01 printing riD |