| Show THOSE QUESTIONS AGAIN IC Ie II It I Mini Otto Otis OU II H Must Tull 11 Wi hk ami alMI H Special to the New w wN Nw Nsw N York Yok Oct o tl The government will wili J tt the tb authority of the interstate commerce or commission to tn examine wit witnesses nesses n under u oath when Edward Eard H anti and Otto Oto H Kuhn the th latter of o Kuhn Loeh Lb Co appear In the fed federal federal eral Itral court crt her bar h and ad why they should i not ot answer er certain quo ques question qu Lions tion tl put pet ft to in 1 them tm at the hearing cran tf of f the commerce cm commissIon held In this city cl laet t winter and M which h they the reu refused upon th the e re of counsel to answer I Th T The questions question for or the most mOt part have to do tb with lh the alleged ale skyrocket finane financing 1 lag ing I 1 of 0 the th Chicago A Alton Alon road rd unit I the merging of o the th Harriman Hanman Pacific systems system tem The Tb T law Iw under uMer which the Interstate commerce communion commIssIon derives it la au authority authority U Uthol thol provide for 0 the Ih punishment of any person or o persons persona on who ho refuse ruM to pr such auch lh questions qulon pr as a the commis commission sion slon may ma propound to 10 them aon In the order to lit show how cause caune eaU which n oer and d Kuhn must mum answer anwer 1 It u I Is I pointed out that the th commission has hu I Ith the th lb right to enquire Into Inlo the business of ot sit all common o mM ra It I la Ii abc alo II cited that tbt th the commission ha hu the right to examine Into all al of o the th accountS account and nd annual anau reports report of such urh common car cr I i ln 1 inn n in t to In make K it report ihn I t on iou Iw t ee I of o such each year yearTh r rIh Th Ih rt mo 1 filet t Important question which hh I declined to answer upon thi th thI lee I of nt Mr Milburn related to t th thI tho I in h IK by h Harriman of at Chicago 1 Alton I iton stick Ik the Ih amount a of r irh Ch 1101 a timid I HI aI I putt all cli 11 q mili II log to 0 the th tb pun in ii ha so and Hie al Ic of I h A I Alton k Ii hy n hits hiM refit nl to 01 ill go 9 Into 1110 In 1 li nf of th thi I Its In the I ts lit ule 0 i u hil KII MII 1 it Ih hIlt n fu ln to hi I t 11 I how hlll nui tUut h o ui f the tIm tk or of r thu thuI h I he h own on nor no would it he hi h explain It II I Is III also II barged v hm hat the I h hi holding hiding of H II It II I i Fi l k mind nd If were 1 of nf Atchison Topeka Tk A I Panic Damn nl Ki Y o stock also elun re rc furd to I n the lb Ih i or r Kuhn Kuti Ix eh A I l Co I di with wit Ii tin thu 11 litter tr that Prom firm having hI Id a an aM broker In Inthe II III ii the I Itt h Urh of the th stock Mock 11 All Al questions n put pu to 10 Mr 1 of nt him hi in i the th pool i nm ii Keif Mt anti Ind Prick and ahI Roger nOIr In the Ih pur rurh chaie hase h of Santa Fe wile WI u m 11 Lt u ile I 1 1 anil 1114 ate II at H U pun l ii rt or I tho Ih t e he Ih t Nion 1 no nl i it that he hp nn 11 ii 11 t ei Cl UN Lie to In InI I rut rent In lit tin II t Ii h lug or ot 1100 tha haie h hr t tue or ur r nto Ik k ani aro aroId cited Id tho Ih fu H itt I well 11 a athe aIh as asI the Ih I Pt in lu i I pin i ii of tf f the th I he ue pit pui Il u uto to I him hi the h facts fl under th tb mUN 1 1 lit per Ir tent cent nl dividend wu nuts declared Th Thu ft I ui ii a I a n I e to III I it know k non wh wIt d t h p t td ail ari 1 t what h Ib ud len and i 11 apprecIation of tuf f Southern o following the th I lit crud with wih th the assor 11 tin that hi his hla only Mon for to answer these thI and ald other question WH wits Aa the th advice of count nul Otto Oto H Kahn of 0 the bankIng hanking and III brokerage firm nr of Kuhn Kin Loch Loeb else also al refused fused lo to an anwer answer wr regarding stock tok purchases and tini IM Ia I cited lt to A 11 Monday to explain why hy Following are a the tho Ih questions question to which Edward H Harriman refused refue to 1 reply at t the hearing he before the commerce commer last la and which he hc h must mUKI shout ho cause why wh he h should hould not nol naver at a hearing III In the 1 federal court in ITt Nw New Tork York on Mon I day dy Were Vere VCr you ou directly or tiller Inter Interested sated ested tt In any alY tocks that were bought between July 1 15 and Aug Aus 17 l i thai thaL appreciated td Did Dd you OU own City any a of the Ihl stork sold fold to tn the Union Pacific by b the Ih Chicago I A I Alton AIton Were the Ih 30 share charts of o Illinois CeO Cen Central old sold by yourself Mr Honors and amid Mr pooled Was Waa al that stork stock acquired with a view of selling It I to the th Union Pacific Wn that thai stock purchased by h you OU at ata atit atI a it I much lower 10 prIce than 17 Uh the price the th Union Pacific paid aId with the in intention of nf turning It over oer to the th UnIon Pacific Did 0 you have hate ha an Interest In II shares hl sold old ol by Kuhn b A I A Company Compy to tn the Ihl tb Union Pacific Wn W Vat thil that 1010 shares share sha acquired by bythe bythe the satin Hume 11 pool pl for or the th purpose pUla nf of o sellIng nailing ln It to 10 the th Union Pacific Were W any An of the dIrectors director of ot the Union Pacific Interested directly or In Indirectly Indirectly directly In tn X New York Central Pent ral stocks tok at the thO time they th were wr sold aol to the Union Unon |
