| Show THAT reels J Til 1 r r Id 1 Sill Am I II 11 I II It u I ha Ig I 1 I u Hi i M I 11 1 i i p ar are under church UIO con enn control n rol tl it contains other maNI equal equally ly I ah rd New N rott nf of f th o 1 III u lone n were Mere lf t or thi th tri trl tribunal bunal buns of the lit United mat a nt In InA InA A M Vindictive rt to have hae h one on of f tl tI tha In that body u at m a malefactor Th Tit i chart n na were wor w thoroughly rt dur durIng Ing n II tons long tn and an and nd th n knew thil th It I Iti II MT i farina AI char har th Ih y Ud 1 rI nut ti h In n th rh the alimony of or ih lr ir wll Willie Williel l Mt but t did dl all 11 tn In their thIr power tn I Im ov m t rn hems the th lb H ik nat imie by ah sw ava I of f M n Rut But ul not Wit h hail standing alt all th Ir rr it I in Ih t H 1 Inal n t 01 that the a rr I nut nt n t by th thi t t In tn what dos 0 th that t pure place pIa the IIA hl p who w r rep it th Ih same ann m harff harg harge ha M e la it a Why did dl they brier their Molly raw ease e before ore th the Hon en ent ato at t if they th had ha tio nn nl or ef f abid 11 I br by IU its decision dechon l I It not cl I sr r that the frame TH of nf r that thit th of off tale fata f ur III r i int h hrand tn tto rand brand the nat I n a bold i iy of ofT f fate ledge T And An t ls le u It not vi that t tall all who that tha platform Ma pies 1 In la I s similar position of hostility to W toe one breath branch kh of th t the h nation national al can sou oil that American T 1 TWe We W are aware aft that t R a 1 cowardly effort ef effort f fort has h beet been be made to make It iI I appear that th UI the n ru i to In join th the plotters plotter ploU In their upon the te Constitution were In h ln a lh th Ih the 0 Rut slat what hat of the prep pr prof Of the th r a antry that fully m the th nat t A till thi hart i art of the Ih frt 11 prep ww WI wt Th ut uti K I Thin Thia ably con On 1 I l l iia 11 We W have ha nut not real rad oil ull ai the evidence n lit this Ihl c rear ee r life I le too tees 10 hort horl Rut But w WA we weve V A ve 1 with slur tin the protest Int Mr Smoot i 01 Mimed by of r League 1 of f Woman III on 1 ione and presented to the th Senate by hy 1 or Dubol Dubois of nt Idaho 8 and nd we nr hod In It II nn nil reason reanon tat stat rd Pd that thai thir for Mr Ir exclusion They Th have h not nut cx r x a d and they th cannot to t III the Importance e of protecting th lb purity of the th horn home nn and l the till an nd It of lit the family Out Dill this chi cannot be bf done by b to tl violate viola both the that th pint of th the Constitution COllI It ut and the th prin principle ciple pie of political To 10 refuse n R neat Rat seat eat at In the elate to a Q man of lr im irre Irr p moral character because hr he h entertains a n loUl faith and I a n member of a organisation which are re to the th Judgment and conscience of ot u II wet vat majority al 11 althe t the th p people of 0 the tI States doe doc d violate the spirit of the tb Constitution In th the same mm article artle The Outlook sold said 4 of M Senator mout referring to another harp chart chartA 41 harpA A moiety might be avowedly organ oman 0 organised Md I fur for the Ille purpose of destroying ct the th and a representative of or such a society should u 14 br be refused a seX seat In either house but there then the is I no pretenSe that th the Mormon Ch M N organised of lt t for or any an such auch treasonable treana purpose vi vides des that Mr moot meM had bad taken ah are h oath or made a pledge lo p of or hostility to the American Nation or of supreme to th t the rmon Church put putting I Itan Wig ting tan It above ave hi hl alle to the Na Nation N tion would be bf good ground for f r excluding tag ing I him from tram th the Senate But tut the vote of or the t Senate hate Ip ws we w take tak to be equivalent to Its Ita It II declaration that he has baa taken no such h oath sad and made no DO such pledge pi piA A As we w have contended every chary charge made mad directly or Indirectly In th the so us called call American platform 1 to un us American n enough to t be he RUlIA n or orv savage v was waa w refuted by b the decision of the Senate In the case cam brought before It by the lb American party part sponsors No Nv one on can cal successfully MICI lien this The ke platform form therefore la is a tales fata hood bond worthy of IU 14 authors author |
