Show A C COURSES OF STUDY Alt It en cn t Opinion on lIn ol 01 Ill Attorney General ent t night to J J W N ot of Pro Provo vo YO an In opinion on the constitutionality of the law of 1905 which prescribes the tho courseR of study l nt lit the AgricUltural college In this opinion the attorney ney general says Your ot or the tho It I be fore foro mo Ine in which you i eck seck on behalf lIebal of ot the board of trustees of ot the Agricultural college collee my m ion 1011 as UR to 10 tho constitutionality of or chapter Session Laws of or 1903 1905 hi which the legislature attempts to pu and limit the of In Iu Instruction in the Agricultural A college l with this object in ou sub flub Dilt the thu following Section X of tho constitution con ot or tho State of ot Utah Is Iii as follows follow The location and establishment by hy existing laws of tho Iho University of ot Utah and nn l tho tural college aru aro hereby confirmed and nil ul tho rights franchises und and heretofore 01 conferred niu 1110 hereby perpetual unto urto said university and agricultural college If Section Isra of tho Complied Compiled I Ia of Utah I SS which appears to hay been enforced and In effect when the tha thai i institution was adopted reads as foi roi The Tho course of ot em om brace tho language and litera tuie turc civil engineering otc Tho question over which tho has hns Mumbled Is whether the light to offer ell of notion In civil Is a privilege and franchise to the college by the constitution and thereby placed beyond tha tho power ot or orth the th to 10 take lake It away The above inquiry appeals to hue have been culled called foith by b an opinion which I tendered to Pi of on Apt II lith In which I advised him that thal haper I Session of or pro 1110 prohibited engineering from being taught In tho college In lelI to 10 your our com communication communication I I 1 beg to 10 say sa In III my opinion ion 1011 tho legislature was wall author i l bed ed under thu tho constitution to 10 thu tho diaper under discussion and to 10 i limit and pi a I cOUt o of or in for tOl the college coll l to 10 eliminate Insl being b offered and Ind taught i heroin It Il IM II plain tn 10 my nw mind l that the 1111 of tho tha Mute constitution never I i Intended that section I 1 of oC X of or i that per IH I a 0 certain curt or 01 I of III n llon In the college und to 10 tho from Inter therewith If Ir It dill did so Intend In my opinion It fell far Cal hoit of the do not that a 1 course of or instruction ami existing the laws of ot the Terri Territory tory tor of or Utah Ulah nt Rt the Um ot at the thu of the state constitution f within the and of j Privileged and franchises es as used lit h section t 1 X TI with without I out further you ou Hie ail 1 th thAt t In my opinion Session MH ot of 1905 lit lii lii n accord with the constitution lid T my opinion of o the lith tilt lilt to tu toPi i Pi of UNell Permit me 1111 to tn th 1 it 1 ilo do not 1101 past pa upon up th Min of the nets licit of If the Ih 11 duty dut to the th |