Show j NORTH CAROLINA RATE IMBROGLIO Congressman Jenkins J of House Judiciary Is Issues Issues Issues sues Statement MAY BE ANOTHER CIVIL WAR Declares it i is Humiliating That Matter Mater Was Compromised and f Nation Naton Partially Surrendered f J tS Tn of oC Resisting rell erl Power by 11 Armed Porco Wili Sooner or Later I 1 Butt In Bloodshed I f 1 Chippewa Falls Wiet WI Aug 1 Con Congressman f t gressman Jenkins chairman of or tho the house Judiciary committee last night f a n statement relative to tc the tho 5 I Carolina railroad rate rata Imbroglio f 11 lio ho 10 Ho says there thero hits has never noer boon bc n any i event since the tho Civil war that coils calls cal for tor torr forso BO so r severe co as net tho tile re recent r cent celt senseless tirade on 01 behalf of ot states against tho the nation Ho lie adds adels that it is d humiliating that the tho matter has his boon been betl compromised and und that tho the 1 hn lies has to some same extent surrender surrendered ed cd I IThe The Tho Civil CIvi war was the result of ot f such Ruch agitation and wo we may ma have havo i earlier than wo we want vant another civil ij war ar he hue said To avert such a Va Ca a and Anal Ind preserve Q Iho tho nation wo vi r 1 mutt t conform to tho the law In oboy tube ubo tho thu law hew anti and havo tho time law mw enforced ac ad according cording to tho the framework provided 11 In I Ithe tho the Constitution Judge Jenkins points point out that tho thin i l court of ot the tho United States I la Is lamade made the time final Unil between judge judg unto state tto I anti 11 nation Mr lr Jenkins believes bele thu tho executive of or tho the state should keep keel ia cool coal maintain his dignity and her ber we wo havo hILO to depend upon upon tin ftc jo jh u If i clary of or tho timo country count to It tl savo sao tho Union Ever since the Ito Civil war ho he said j Other states have havo had similar s acid did not ulo fools of themselves i II or 01 It declare war Wil and tho questions WolO emu f j decided uy by 1 tha th supreme court and aitel no nol n 0 I l haul l results followed fallowed If I all al nu flu IU are going g II to usurp tona of tho court Roil Judge what federal fl net let shall bo b nullified no lie ono one 1 can call cal tell tIl where It will wl end emit 1 Why h should state authorities de do decide t cide cdo they lh tIme shall shah exercise every mol power nt ut their command to prevent such con can consummation summation This Is Lu nn an In unlawful nt at erupt to oppose lawful 11 efforts j This tulle taUt about state authorities re resisting S suiting federal power boner by b armed fordu till I sooner or later lar end In II possibly In II tire tiro Ihl disruption of ot tho the Union S In II conclusion Mr lr says tho the supreme court or Of o tho lie United States may mi err en It IL I may amity differ with wih time tho view I of ot n it great greil of or the tho people but bu t that hat may many mn be ne the Ito Constitution ays HA lIB it decision Is In final and must lust be te e ic mc IC the thu theand guided as the time law of or and mind thai Ihl Is ii what must govern over u Better Doter live under a It I wrong decision han ban anarchy that must pro pre all eail In imi this Ihl country If Itell each h state auth Is going to 10 disregard the tho Const tut n of or the thur the United States and lull assert Its ts own power right rJ ht or 1 wrong In de du delance titmice lance ot of the lii national power thereby i und timid Ind absolutely disregarding I his this great Ilont government that Ihal tins has cost costo tO so o many lany generations BO en much macit to 10 nut nil PI it 1 |