Show I UH II N The U v of If t In Is wild said lu tu und ci elsie a t Iota H it phi a for fi r of Iron lil lA Lisa flint w to Lo is be the oil atm ly Iy ua it II as by b UK tilt van ears pro jiro itt eel itself ur tram from HID Shin mesa ion and annoy almo UIt gucU U e g n triton they the assume n 55 lI When Wh ll strikes heavy lo los st upon i men usia check the th of ot u tt city ell and Its credit creditor l or when riots Ind lawlessness result th thorp rp should hOl d be b some legal remedy und tuiti arbitration sc seem nis to lo be bo the lie only emily one Tho Now law 11 or labor but th Ih of lit the th right tight to Lo t strike On thus the other It IL protects tIme the laborers by b lot for forbidding bidding employers to tu discharge union men and allt hiring nonunion to take tn ku their places In other nth r lU too thu I INe New Ne law iw and tho thu of 01 arbitration favor tavor r union men lumen Tho Thu working of this law lI w may not nol have havo been entirely satisfactory at nl all att limos to nil all parties concerned no law hew Is but it his has h 8 almost entirely prevented I strikes end and lockouts and titus thus It line has proved a 0 great greal 11 1 to lo industry tr If JC California Will Ill I take the lend lead in making arbitration compulsory by law other follow American la Ia laborers borers It has been I 1 1 will not will willingly Ingi surrender theli right to strike Hut flut tho fact tact Is IA that many strikes mo lItO decided de on not lol on an the Initiative of ot la In laborers borers Loro but hut ns as n a result of o agitation by hY demagogues who tho Dr personally Inter Interested Interested ested In III conflicts between employers timid 1111 c Were ore laborers always morally 1111 to do du as they tho please plea e many strikes would not bo him declared and ami a nIl they the all end In compromise That ThatIs la ItS one ona reason why wh should be tried first Another An Lher Is this that lie tho public inns has a i right that Lh t must t bo protected In the matter of or publiC utilities no one olle has n a right to deprive the tho public of o the services for which It has paid by 11 valuable franchises and anti for tor which It Is further paying as nil It avails Itself lt el of ot the tho services rendered It Jt would be bo a I crime to tear up street streetcar car trucks and obstruct the lines Hiles of ot communication on which the people so largely largel depend d imd It U Is no arm Ie le lees s a I crime to It prevent by b o any all other menus the tho owners of oC utilities frOnt from per performing performIng forming their duties For JoOl rcA ro son the public has hue the Indisputable right to 10 protect Itself by II legal enact enactments ments men IS that thal prevent strikes rind boy bo cots cols and provide for tor arbitration |