| Show 4 4 41 44 tolt 4 AD k there were three camp 4 leg les manufacturing rat trap traps 4 X at the rate ot at 1000 dozen 4 per dy day at the coet coat ot of IS AS T cents per dozen tuey eold sold io to the dealer al at 2 20 0 bonts per dozen and the dealer retailed 4 hem them at 30 centa cents per dozen 4 one manufacturer edver 4 used hie his trap traps 4 h creased created and hta his cot cost went nent 4 down dow n to 10 centa cent a per 1 h ke lie looted the dealer price 4 4 to 15 cents cent per dozen and the r retail price to 26 coats per pet d dozen h now ow aho vho ho paid for this ad 4 t h the er didn dian t tor for his hi nt 4 down alter after being advertised fr due to increased production product lan the dealer didn t for big prof pro ita its increased the customer cueto pier 4 dida t I 1 tor 0 r be W wa as able to a purchase at a lower price f than ras a possible before 4 no now since the 4 the retailer abd the t 4 tu were all paying alsis 4 for or the trap traps alter after they were k 4 advertised than they were 4 a previous to the advertising w p who paid for or this 4 i ing the two manufacturers 4 who did nat went out of 0 business buel neg and therein 4 M lies the aner to the ques f alon who pay pays tor for advertis ing 1 THE FELLOW atto 4 DOESN T AD g 4 exchange 4 n 4 |
