Show line to uintah basin urged by salt lake and other utah 0 of C exceptions to the ex pro coed adverse report on the apall bailon of 0 the salt lake I ake and denver rall fad for permission to construct a line fro from froin in provo to craig colo coto to connect with the moffat line and provide a new and shorter route be awen aalt lake and denver have been faleu with the interstate com aitse by the applicant road the salt lake chamber of 0 commerce and the foll alii group in to rested in the proposed line as a means of developing the uintah basin hasin basin company dry gulch iri company duche duchene kne chini club fort Due hosai com club myton commercial club haegely oil and refining company haven oil and refining corn cam pany poor roosevelt commercial dab club utah Gil gilsonite sanite commac and uintah club of 0 vernal ernal aya says the tribune following public hearing tn in salt lake last august the interstate comm ishlon examiner recommended that the tor for permission to build through the uintah basin be dented denied the exception of 0 the salt lake and denver line cite cites that the issue in the cage case la Is ot of vital importance to eastern na utah and western colerado and declares that a fertile territory miles in length by miles in width cannot for all time be left without rail transportation exception vias ae in answer to the recommendation ot of the examiner that it Is I 1 recommended that the commission find that the present resen and future public co fence and necessity are not shown to require the construction by the applicant of 0 the proposed line of railroad andl and that the application be denied without prejudice in its exception the salt itkov chamber ot commerce comi orce are such a 4 conclusion contrary to tile the evidence eTi dence of record the amber stress the economic I 1 e elty sity and importance to the intermountain mou west went of rail facilities acHl tle to develop the basin while alle the aepli cant line defends itself against certain questions brought by the con cora mission a examiner the applicant line declares arev its proposed construction would not bo be opposition to the union pacific system its main argument however ie is dt d reeled t d against the attack ot of the denver ivr and klo rio grande western vestern the system which appeared before the hearing at salt lake and opposed the salt lake and denver deaver railroad a application the applicant declares a line through the basin will develop adequate tonnage and that by virtue 0 of a shortened distance between salt lake and denver trat fie fic of 0 considerable volume will be developed the denial dental ut of this application ts Is much further reaching than simply the to give the population of the uintah basin rail facilities reads the applicant applicants a exception la in that it thwarts the destree desires oc of utah and colo ado cities tor for development of 0 a new transcontinental route and the purpose of the construction ol 01 the modal moffat railroad and the boring of the moffat tunnel through james peak it would seem that under the circumstances the corn com should grant this app applicant lican the certificate to construe t udder reasonable restrictions realizing I 1 that finan financiers tiers TOW spend neither time nor money to unless and until they are assured ot of such a permit frank roberts charles M larson ellsha and floyd bryant W P elass rth irth and jessie jesse drough all of aurty valley w re in vernal to meet with the uintah club tuesday |