| Show d L L NUNN BRINGS SUIT OVER WATER Pleasant Grove and Caleb Tan Tanner nor ner State Engineer Are The Defendants TITLE IS POINT INVOLVED City CI lo I Keep for Cul Cui cj cI It I lor A ul H was S loday Od lu II the federal f dorl court w I malinger of or the tho Power company cOlpany ts I plaintiff the d named nUIe ire e City and Caleb Tanner state The complaint seta set forth that complainant h not nOI and never noor has be bp jn n ft n resident of ut the State of Utah Ulah It ItIs Itla Is la further alleged that on June 7 plaintiff an Application In tho of ot office fice nce of Ihl state engineer r to Appropriate 15 feet of the 1 I r pf It drove creek Ir k Utah county to t be b diverted and carried l certain distance to be he used In n connection C with the water of Creek for the generation of or electric en ene n e CIn y and 30 days dR S alleges allege Plaintiff the Iho city of or 11 Grove through till Its mayor James O Bullock Dullock filed a protest with 1111 the Ih engineer 11 lnE r against I the th of ot Mr Ir Nunn t that Illat Hie Ih waters of f Battle Batlle Creek had already been appropriated and be p e of or its know n was 31 the Ihl main of oC the city for tor culinary that to 10 mix with lh it the waters of check Impure because of the tho grazing nt of vast n near nr by would militate t Ihl Inhabitants of oC creek rk Impure b cau o e of ot the Iho source 1 mentioned a wa wt water ter supply SUI Tho complaint C Ui Ihen n goel on oil to 10 state stalo that complainant denied ach and ev every C ery Pty ot or tile the and asked Hie Mate engineer to 10 Brant a to tu both sides of the controversy but bUI that that thai no notice of nr Mr arbitrarily re the the court IH IN petitioned to 10 cite before that thai tribunal HIP said aid defendants to show how cans 1311 why hy the rejection of the application cation should nut not be bt rescinded |
