Show V THE T re S SUIT uber U I 1 T 6 DISMISSED r IS a F i I 1 s a r r ed samuels samuel not required to fa fay y for diamond ring lost by his hia daughter tho the suit of minnie hatch vernon against E 0 samuels and edith sam sain carao came up for hearing before judg last tuesday night J A wilson represented the plaintiff ands and pope hanson looked after the interests of the defendants the ault was for the recovery of a diamond ring or its equivalent in cash to the amount of 74 tho rho witnesses it nesses were the plaintiff and E D samuels the daughter not being pres ent the evidence disclosed tho ho fact that udith edith did not take tho the ring with the intention of keeping it and that she promised to return it to its ite 0 owner before the dance was waa over the two did not meet again that night whom when a short time afterwards the plaintiff asked for the return of the ring she waie w informed that it had been lost she the plaintiff had a talk with the father on the subject and asked him what he waa as going to do about it lie ile replied in substance that he was not going to do anything about it that he did not consider that he should be held to an the loss of tho the ring on cross croaa examination she was asked if samuels had bad ever promised her that he would pay for the property and she ehe replied that he be had never made such euch a promise to her the attorneys for the defendants I 1 claimed that a parent is not responsible for the contracts made by a minor child unless such auch contract is made in the presence of and with the sanction of tho the parent decisions of tho the supreme court were cited to uphold the claim mr samuels tosti fiet that tho the ring was obtained without his knowledge ills iha daughter had in formed him latar that she had possession of th tho ring and also that she had lost it it was brought out dm ing the bilal that the court had no jurisdiction avei the gill and that before suit could bo be bi ought brought against her it would be nece bEary to have a guardian ad ligum appointed tho the judge dismissed tho the suit on th ground that there was no cause of action the attorney for the plaintiff announced intention of taking an ap peal pal to tho the district court |