Show mm mm FOUND mm sentenced fenced to fifteen months in the penitentiary Penitent lary judgment against john for 50 edmund hirsch must serve fifteen lit in intas in the penitentiary for embezzlement the ahe jury which was deliberating in the caso case as aa the express went to I 1 ress resa last friday rendered a verdict i ater having been out about ter minutes monday morning judge johne john E hooth of the district court passed sentence sheriff T C mcneill conveyed the i ho prisoner to the penitentiary at salt lake on thursday Ihu raday in the case ot of E E hoin vs samuel B rugh ruah mention of which was made in the last issue of ahi thia paper the injunction was dissolved the court holding that there ther was ewas not sufficient grounds on which to continue it and that horn had not established the fact that he hal ha I 1 or owned the water rights in question T W odonnell attorney for the plaintiff charles demoisy attorney for the defendant robert marshall vs john T pope a suit to recover judgment for money paid and received attracted more attention than a suit of that kind usually attracts because of pope being a counselor at law the evidence introduced by plaintiff showed that pope had agreed to guarantee marshall mai Ma shall ishall from loss if he paid him a certain sum of money william carroll held a note against marshall for which with interest amounted to 50 miranda carroll divorced wife of william cariall can Cari oil oll obtained a judgment against her former husband huband through garnishment pro ce ec edings and acting on the promise of pope marshall paid the amount after being assured that if tho the carroll note ever came up for payment pope would make it good carroll sold the note to 11 G geisler who later on obtained judgment against marshall for 50 and again marshal had to pay 50 the evidence of marshall was aad by bertis mcconkie McCon kio who testified lie heard pope say ho he would guarantee that the plaintiff would not be forced to pay the amount again pope on the tha r witness stand denied that he had ever made such an agreement and took the stand that his action in collecting them the said money aiom fi om marshal was legal ahe judge however instructed ted the jury that the proceedings in the first transaction were NN ere void and of no effect the jury was composed of jesse jease willis wilha ira burton william mekee mckee charles batty john H chase E A daniels Dar nels A A haws dEdward an tolton after a ba beef cef deliberation the jury returned a verdict rendering a judgment in favor of marshall and against pope for the sum of 50 A new trial will be asked for the plaintiff was represented by D D houtz and don B colton the firm of pope hanson represented the defendant fen dant S P dillman vs mary donoher suit for damages for back rent and costs defense entered objection on the grounds that the ser services vicos and summons were not regular according to la lav v the objections were overruled and the matter now stands on the mer its ils of the case oscar collett vs the ashley co op and T C mcneill sheriff collett owed the coop co op a bill and judgment was rendered against him in justice murrays Mur rays court in salt lake county an error was discovered and the case was docketed in the district court at salt lake at the last term of the district DistrI Lt t court here judge booth ruled that certain property levied on was exempt the matter came up at this term on a motion of the defend defendant antto to permanently enjoin the sheriff from serving the execution the motion was waa novt and whatever property the pl may have that la Is not exempt may be levied on to satisfy the abt alberta sorensen vs nephi sorensen petition for divorce camo came up on demurrer by the defendant tho the plaintiff ia its aa given sixty days in which to amend i the complaint the couple was waa marri marn fd ed in richfield in 1894 the plaintiff charges non support and cruelty she claims that at dragon in 1905 1906 hp pulled a gun on her and threatened to kill hei pope bope hanson attorneys for the tho plaintiff TW T W odonnell ney for the defendant the uintah river irrigation company v cl ra ira van et al demurrer to the complaint sustained and the plaintiff given sixty days to answer this is a suit to condemn rights of way on indian allotments in the matte the estate of george fraughton deceased final account heard and approved action on peti peli tion for the discharge of the administrator was deferred i in the matter of the estate of melis melia sa reynolds deceased petition for order to confirm sale of real estate action deferred benjamin kermode vs the gilson asphaltum company mr air kermode was injured while in the employ of the company at dragon last september and in his complaint he alleged negligence on the part of the company ile he asked for damages in the sum of 1999 D D houtz acted as his hia attorney and lucian dickinson and T W odonnell acted as aa at attorneys tornes for the defendant company the selection of a jury taking testimony and hearing arguments consumed Wed wednesday nesda thursday and today the jury was composed of A A haws william mckee charles batty edward tolton adelbert collett Collet fc jesse willis J L mcconkie and nephi at the hour of going to press the joiy had not rendered a verdict |