Show 01 1 4 A LA lavt 11 IN it A ikirt blown a I 1 nan nair salt alt lake city utah dec 23 22 the supreme court of utah landed handed do dor r its decision in ili the case of 0 vs the Can canalling asling board wherein a writ of BS as naked to restrain the baird from can N assing the votes volca cal at the list last election on the ground that the australian ballot was declared to be unconstitutional unanimously sustaining the to law the ni aln points in tle the con broer y were ere I 1 ahat I 1 hat tile the numbering of ballots ballot 8 annulled the of secrecy IB 11 provided b the and a 2 that tile the house never really passed the bill in rely concurring in the k ken ben en ate amendments rhe boune burnal is in deficient in nil toting that a j ea find na vote waa mas had that the court holds that the ev evidence flence Is all in favor of its regular passage the Is overruled chelf justice zine prepared the opinion ion justice bartch alit file another opinion concurring in the decision blon but differing in the reasons which lead up to the conclusion it Is understood that justice miner entertains artill different reasons reason while mille concurring in the result senator arthur brown was wag tile the leading attorney in ili dwor of 0 the file of the law while ackson powers judd and henderson as at attorney torne a for the 0 ird |