Show Questions Tom Snyder Dear I am sorry to hear of Snyder's but report about one of District employees to be extremely biased and full of half- Let's evaluate the context of to the last A statement that of the teachers under this employee while principal of the high school had trouble with him is not entirely he did have some but in a signed- document by staff members support and 17 showed to his this principal had the Utah State Board of Education Professional In On May 1974 and was not to expire until June When the new to the he appraised the tion and brought with an scheme wa upon Based upon the high principal's previous record as elementary principal at where he war authorized and counseling to tion since the staff had previously a vocational The role definitions were changed however The as tuna e. This like a traffic was not involved in this job or associated with the Uintah School When we hired the agreed that his organizational framework would reviewed This being the it was felt that there need be a revamping on the staff In an audit meeting of October 21 1977 concerning Duane Carr of the State Board of Education strongly recommended in a district our size that we need a full time secretary and parts person and a full time These were to aPProved costs from tation's categorical funding and not to district's e individual's contract last year was His role definition changed this as well as days to be worked and he received a raise of or 3 Had he remained on the same b definition his woud have n a almost 0 in other administrator's ed a 7 plus as did teachers and This 1 nis U ls a who does does not not tT ype harassment School Board member |