| Show how enuch more are the provisions of section ao 20 of bill under consideration by this the citizens who will nol swear that lie is not going to violate a law by hi refusal is ipso faw cd to a severe penalty total dis franchie ement and could anything be more monstrous rou the supreme court of N cw york in Got chens v 58 bar hour aard lindor lait lichi matured by amilon Amil cn deop an d arr K 1 tt ienir i ejai wathla withla lh of the coot tilio ia rf la alli tho gentleman from virginia standing in hit panco in this on the of march 1882 cd of alie eighth and ninth sections of the bill then under consideration I 1 be w on ay iy ti up arl DI III aftin unal si if I 1 tr ll 11 buttan kf 0 nil ccoce lh lile rIi of th copl I 1 en noten allt rl lt or lice by 10 ft ot power which K I 1 boelt nl imao to ill cl atie binl bulur ot t ct union I 1 orbi lie eaid further upon the do rani toldia bo alic nil hi c ala ii to tru tault lt ii anco t ho d lacto lc to to tarr ot 11 without nd tarr will ti hit for ice ul COO f Ui riita itA seiei willij will lj atlin tb blutt in it laucci ri rot i I 1 by clr 0 thir rr clr deritt dp riTt lion ct ibar lii rj ali 0 fabir tr 11 ll d copl cir cirian irn birti that lill which th thus denounced became a liw marc 1882 alic provia ons of tho and by the terms of th twenty fluit i section oatlie 1511 now under consideration the ninth tec lion of the act of march 1882 continued in force yes mr speaker hint board which the gentleman eo eloquently as an autocratic oil farchy garchy as in ita and capable of achieving n much unhappiness by kllc plunder of their the deprivation of their liberties and clr vio lation of their right an estr existed among any in ancient or modern timos this bill to be continued force and and that too the gentleman knijf that the territorial assembly 0 utah faits last session albil nic cling in every FC ible ali requirements of the act of mancl but which writ caine ly ve od by the tarn governor 0 the territory I 1 know it hat been cla hneil tji alie supreme court of the arii c murphy ct al Y rr raf y atal U S 15 has the power of congre to errac ili test catli such as was provided bj the eighth of the act 0 march 1882 but I 1 anit clial thai judgement jud gement of alie court docs not meet raisch by the proposed legislation contain ed in action 25 of thi bill alie 8 lection of the act of mancl 1882 only applied or those guilty of unlawful cohabitation it requires all the ingenuity of the Sup roine court to get around the decision of hint court in the cummings cag to eg capo the logic of the opinions in half dozen baies by the af ne toralf Ala baon geoga kon ducly refer lo 10 hubar vs itri 2 P F G tchan v 58 barbour Bar buur anle vs afao boido 3 chiv 11 gag iii be Mati crof 7 arrer campbell TS tho f georgiu 11 ua guidici TS bufurd 1 dd a nr at week |
