| Show A DAY OF or DIVORCES i JU Jugi More Mors nor Ten Tea Cases Costs and aud Grant Nine Nino Decree There were wert 10 divorce cases nn on JuIl Judge t tM M Morses Merse regular weekly divorce calen calendar day dar yesterday afternoon en and Ind of ot tho those alne were wIre granted decrees decree of or divorce and on one was wai a denied dIled Myrtle Myrtl 1 L l Dewey DewI ewy WitS Will denied a divorce from H II HD D w y because It wit wee shown that the th defendant had hash supported up It to within three months prior to the tho com of the tile action hence her hiI charge of or failure lo to o support WM was not proven It H wa a shown hown that the time treat treAL treatment ment r received 11 by Mr Mrs Irl Dewey at mit th the hands hand of ot her husband hod had undermined liar her health and she bad had teen Iten compelled to undergo five V operation A As AI timers there therewa wa we no nto allegation In the complaint to conform with such testimony tine tha di dl divorce vorce oree VMS isas denied but plaintiff was wan AI on lit leave leao to amend h her r complaint If tt she nhe he de desires lr In accordance with the te tit limon gIven l Decree of divorce were wre granted ranted In Inthe the Une following cases car Mary Iary E Jensen against t Andrew Jensen Jenen failure to snip mitt port Florence Glass against William T r Glass U desertion i and failure to Mn White bUe against Herbert J It failure to support Ellen Eggen against John gen cruell cruelty J Fannie anle Caron spinet Caron Caton de tie defendant convicted of ot felony John I ag against Mattel de deReI eel ReI thorn Ella WI Welch h J James JamM a men Welch de desertion desertion item wid II failure to support Mar Mary Pranks Prank against agnet Joseph Joeph T P Pratt Pran ke desertion arid and failure to support Ann S 8 Peterson a against Hb usher r H U I Peterson failure allure to support I j f k L IL L J 4 t |