| Show Hf HEAVY J JUDGMENT GMt T fOR M S SPIKING G Jury A Awards tier Her 25 In Suit Utah Ulah Ii I lu ht I Rail Kail all way 3 ay Company pa II FOR DEATH OF lIED HER HUSBAND Wan as lied II h liy One of or I Defendants Cars Curs At of Hast And Anil So South One Onte of the tho largest verdicts In a 11 I pc le e ional Injury flU suit null It ever Ir ren rn In the district In III com coun county ty b by the Hie JUl jury its In till ties case eue of ot e ot alaI al ai against th the d Ita II Power com cent company pany pIn mid and the lite Utah Light i company ny In Judge lUtchies court ourt title Time The Jury found the I Unit en In III Inthe the case in iti favor or of plaintiffs plaintiff and its us tI the at ut The notion was wan brought on Aug SO 1902 to recover fur for tho tito death o of Thomas w v Spiking the ani father of plaintiff who wa was killed by hy byone one arts of or defendants cars cant at the ties corner cornI of at Second South Knuth and r Ka laist t Temple streets eU eUon on the night of ot Aug 18 10 6 Wl 1901 It U wal avas aa alleged that defendant Willi negligent In not lIot providing UH its ears card with lUll and In not nol equipping the cat car In question with n a good braKe broke It ft IN is also claimed that the tho car ar watt was run met nt at u a leigh high rate roto of ot speed at nt the intersection Intel section where the ac no accident client happened und anti theist that the failed allot to the gong goni auth thereby warn am l pedestrian of the approach of or th car carThe The defendant charged Spiking with wiLls contributory negligence II and nIl claimed that the thee occident accident enl was due clue to his own The Jury however tailed failed t I see It II wa way and ani returned u II ver sor verdict or diet dict In favor flor of plaintiffs plaintiff for Just half of ot the amount asked |
