| Show COMING BACK TO UTAH C Cans H A Against 0 U II H Payton A ain t the Mutual Life tHo to lo La bo Hore HoreSt St Louie Oct IC Ie The United court of ot appeals today sent lent ck to the court of 01 Utah for tor trial before u IL JUI the case caN of ot George H II Pu ton tonof of ot Utah Ulah who ho lue sued 1 to i it 11 rover cover on 1 a it policy l Issued aued b by the Mutual Life Ite company of lit l New Nw w York foi fot which had hud been decided In of or the company b by the nial trIal judge Tho The polIcy a nN on ott the tho lit lIfe Ufa of or Mr Mrs Ir Harriet laI Payne who Iho tiled d within a R year yum after the thu polity itChY wn wale and anti I lx before foro torl I the lie had paid ii lilly anything I ii I mig ton tor It 1 K li KL liI J I L Ch llly of lit Salt Lake City the agent claims h Il wave gave the policy polley to Mm Mrs lrA Payne In tn order to swell his hili lne s 1 sund und altI will 1 a gold gaul watch which whirl the oem com company pany lant n wa sits liS offering as is a II to 10 tIme the agent In lit Utah who vho wrote thin monet moat In III Insurance This was WAD In On flit this claim th the Mutual holds that the roll policy y Will was not a legal lelal contract a al although though rhen helme y sent lent In to th the company Its Hit of ot tiit first YOI premium was WUK W out of or 1281 and the poll toli cy f II waa t aR am dul duly dub delivered h he its gas gave Ital the h agent u Li note for tor time the pr pre premium which he wa was ft to 10 par when he lie got JOt the tIme mone money The rhe cOln company claIms that the policy wag WAI through a scheme between the time agent and th Inured insured to deceive rOUn |