Show THE contradictory nature of the evidence given by medic experts in tile the famous luetgert trial at chicago is once more reviving the belief that all expert medical testimony in murder cases should be employed and paid by the state not as aa now with the intent of proving the guilt of the accused but to give strictly ina impartial partial evidence concerning the discoveries made during the course of their tl inquiries qu iries As conducted at present expert testimony is regarded to a great extent as a humbug and with justice A doctor testifying for the prosecution instead of impartially relating his big deductions from froin a given set of facts gives his evidence with a view to the conviction of the accused colori lorinc or it all with that end lal in view V upon the other bandtke hand band the expert for the defense will not acknowledge acknowledge the truth of anything which will injure the cause of his employer unless it is so plain as to be absolutely beyond dispute in cases where an individual Is suing a railway company for damages received by wreck or otherwise the expert medical testimony te sti is a screaming farce the physician employed by the injured party will declare the most moat trivial hurt a permanent physical disability while the most serious injury is deemed but a and temporary injury by the railway companas comp anys surgeon 0 if the phyan ph abi clang were judicially determining the actual scientific status of a given condition or fact instead of acting in the capacity of counsel upon either side their knowledge would be available for the purpose for which it il is supposed to be exercised at present it only serves to bewilder the jury |