Show I r IS THE TALK Of MI MINING I G U II The Tho Wall wu Utah Copper Case Piled Last Saturday Creates Much Ii Public Interest COLONEL WALL HAS HAG RETURNED 4 i J Conic Came In from California Sa Company Does DOell Not No Ot Need eed 3 v or Improvement v I I h hi ha occurred In state atte In lit Inthe th the way av or ot f II t If 11 on that hat h hu hii hueu eu quite tilte 10 BO et n l r II ran r l t tho trial fit f Lle Mum Mam Jn central CR cae us i I th the hI hIJ J of ot the suIt In district courton court courton on Saturday last in which col 0 01 10 K A AWall I Walt Wall I Ii and mci the Utah Copper COm company emny pan M 1 tt 1 and tm oHI I r re eera r of lit that r re HB 1111 ll It ramp rame a s N complete While hlll the tact fact had hali b been brn 11 known knon n for tor Home nm thru that thal Col ol 01 Wall Willi I ho li IK vl viro e president nl of f the till Utah I Copper oppI opposed to the d l to It till II nut lit K II control of fit the mine to the Ihl company II Hi HL I th tb tho price of or 20 20 n II f yot yet the Ill I did not nol even e that thaI th Ihn differences dIfference b bt be between t wen tween himself and III In Inthe the bl big B mm mine had the crucial stage t Ire I that would un an t r appeal l ti the Iho to lo straighten I mutters matteu rut cut 1 DUI But war huH him Iwon heln declared and nd IheI the I legal eal bottle battle to 10 follow wilt Will no doubt he a holly hotly contested on one It 11 will bet ben be bf n It t fight fIM between giant i so o lo n ak r Unsocial giants fur tur arrayed on either f Hide are mm mn 1 million of ut ra capital nt Rt their An I Is that Illat of or Ihal the lift l American m Hers company In While the latter la In not mentioned 11 HK ac a defendant It 11 I Inot Is II riot not unlikely thin this corporation an au I adjunct to 10 the tho Smelting S S k 11 Defining company om will ph play un an Im Important Y pHIt pait In III th the Ihl tight fight The S en want wante the utah opper mine h Iia hava It tid will with not be he until un S til It lands land H 1 control as It hat has set et nut out 1 1 to do ho That being th the rase It In is nut not I unlikely the tho will oh In In sup I S If lr It needs need it from that source S In hi treating with detail the complaint is S med IlIad In Judge Judie Mows Mores division of or the theS S i S district court tells tell of or some Ime rather p Ill It circumstance loading up to the this I F S o of if the meeting of director at al r Colorado Spring when whon le S were passed panned authorizing an Increase In I the capital stuck of the company frontS front from S to th Issue of ot S I worth of or lx pet per rent Interest learS lear bear S J In Ing bonds to be he secured b by a mortgage I I S iV i on thin tho of the company con ion V 5 5 ble him Inlo the tho Increased stork atS At nt S I 5 I the he option of ot the 1 r at th the x S rill rate of 10 0 a IL share 1 4 S Pol oh 01 Wall tells how liAr sari early I In lu th the year Rr Ii avid arid Secretary IO IoIA O came ame to him with a proportion t to tn borrow horrow Inon money from the General Genral I Electric company to make the pro proponed S Ii Improvement which Included I th the bUilding of ot a II large concentrating t J S ml mill mil Tho rho General lenoral mp company It 11 t JH III alleged 1 to 10 olin loan the this company 5 S any ony euro aum tip lip to 10 on 4 5 nn unsecured note nole bearing fiveS five j jp S S p per pcr r cent Interest with the I S o o that the te bo be S allowed to th tin courier copper product I I S of the time minI ot ut th the prevail I I Ing market S price This proposition S S J tho thio colonel warn vaa Natte I I to him and met hi It j 1 i About June 1 I the plaintiff explains I S I 4 he hI was waw met mIl with another proposition S sj which wa was to nell iv Ii control on I of the 1 I lS mine on Oil th thO hll Mil of or 30 a Ii share harl or I II I 1110 nor This Thill al o w was wan acceptable S Q S I S I two tuo Week hater luler came clime a third t S f from rem the tho president and sic III f 4 iery to 10 tile the effect treel that the they could get S U K a share for u a control of lit the prop im arty erty This WIN wa rejected About June Jun 1 the plaintiff declare further that he hI received advice from tho the named that they haul had en In enteNd teNd leNd Into n tin 1111 r i agreement with IheI the I American company J giving It un an o QUOI tion on a I 61 II per DPI cent Interest in tile minI mIne on onI r I UI the haIs cit Clr if 2 J a 1 share hure and ti H i of or 3 J pw t nt or 40 0 tents centi aS n It S S S share leaving the net purchase price 5 I 0 2900 2960 per it share shiar rl with thi under S thit the American j I would l lend Ind tid th S Utah Copper company thi Interest itt ut t fc Ii per tIr cent 1111 The plaintiff I 0 wa was to join In lii this den deal I and t he n sp declined Hd 1 Ing hI at al lh the Ihl I to Itt iPPI It would mean the loin IU of fio 10 i Kha sharr or nr oiw S 5 5 S to him mid alid that If it tl tin tie stock nf of Ut Lb the Wes Willi a an had I been proposed the tho of or hili S t I r tH would amount to 10 II a Iou loaa of ot 4 I not lens III i I I Co oh 01 With Willi returned from mm 1 I morning Mid Mul when seen Hern by byn byI I 1 I L n a News Newa representative the I da lay day laid Mid h he hf had nothing now to add adil s J to whet What Jut t had 8 d already been enumerated I i sp r In the complaint that th the J I of or Ih he the suit ault was 11 dotin dOlI a few duya earlier curlier U j S than he expected It II W would be lie a up IiII his hla t it t S attorneys decided that thai In order hi to III PI pre prevent rf I ent vent iii a the meeting call called i I l S ed cd d lo to take taki place e In Jersey City Ity to 10 I f morrow frim taking towards I carrying out nul Ut the scheme th the theS S 1 f S prompt l Issue fue of OC a II restraining order r warn wan warnS I S S Co oh Wull Willi Ih H Nai y YI lh diw 1 pot not S newt to 10 mike the Ihl I II II Hint HI I t I 1 win I H nirIe S S 1 F enough I t hu hulM II H If r r H oil II In hi i the tho mini muni at I ami l In J ii i Ii mill I I of nf ton O I long I capacity 11 II tt II If ws lIr n H h ho Is IN r reily i to Into nto a II i Mi Ii tit tJI t I In to do thiM tot for th 1111 h ho he will Wilt build the tho railroad end and mill mid iid equip both for operation for tor the la last 1 named sumA sum BUln A Asked ked If It the MInE of the tho suit lull by hy Pol oh 01 Wall Wull would interfere with tho the out of the company roll con construction plans Manager t D I 1 c suld durin during the Ihl lit day that he did not nut believe It t I nee lilt Raid he l holY hov it will Interfere with II IM US In itt th the least leant A As All far Ii I T 1 know Me we will with go 0 right ahead I with Ith |