Show HE CLE 11 lil is if protest havi haibe lill ben filed taia Irre gulat ties it I 1 the 11 0 duty daty of the county bleik to la render hia decision Ao cordine to tho the law as 63 construed li by bishop in relation to tile the certificate of of the citizens of the eizens party for i ache CO county Ity alid objections thereto in considering 0 the questions ini ill 1 ved cd herein m and nd in the abort time lowed by law I 1 havu have deac reach bed the hereinafter stated elated in arriving at these hese r conclusions I 1 n no 0 o coni the statute it in fruch es ea and the arguments argenal aitt and cita PS its of authorities an pt buted by L r courts counsel ea for bot both th parlors hereto section 1 13 of chapler W I 1 f laws daiv Is utah is ia as follow fulloni ful lowi all of nominations i kiich are in appa apparent reut ih the provisions of this act ac ill be b deemed to be ba valid unless lection thereto therelo shall be duly ii ide in writhing within three days a lir ir tho allin filiar r of the tame same in a such euc n objection is made nolle biotic eo f shall forthwith be mailed 11 41 ll the who raiv be 1 I acted thereby ther rby addressed addie addi saed essed to them u their respective all ad rie amsia ancor any ur places ot of resi regi LII 01 ice as given in tho the certificate nomination the officer with irith awat he origin at gatow Gat gw avzi de liall pasi lupori upon knef oi 01 such objection and hi decision 1 I be alual provided such ahall decide such buch objection t thin at least forty eight hours hom s pr the same bame is filed atilt and an obi I 1 lion sustained may be remedied defect cured ripon abs tbs original t ficare or by an amendment reto or by filing a new certify te levi within thin three days after such euch lection is su sustained bained ta ined from the forgoing section it an j irs that thil the clerk has no c i ver to decide upon any question ing to the merits of trie respect a nomination but is held strict to those debets del i acts apparent upon 4 ft face of the certificate th thy oh ob tion lion in said protest sett setting ing forth at the nominations of the various acers is not sufficiently tit described bed not well taken and is overruled in regard to till objections in ir ring that the powers conferred arcin run upon thomas smart jr al all not being understood by the ners of said eaid petition is led from the fact that every pern is to the law 1 nis is matter is to be alone decided t i ohp person himself the objection that the places of r identa of tile tho various signers are no ic written opposite their names alles not invalidate the petition d id A certificate therefore this ob tion lion is ia overruled the objection i ri ide that each mer has not specifically designas desi riat i his residence the question as to tie oe intent of our present election itself it appears manifests aas N s f iia m the authorities upon pon this itter atter the term place of ecsi i ilea in this connection n cannot if consider edas it 1 justice of the tha constable precinct but 1 I ice ur or aloft positively directs tho the opinion 1 diat tt it is is a precinct of the voters of reference Ite ference a or county I 1 T ill if city ort time fin fine einie e the question arose to tile the menning of the term pre lire net let as used in the constitution constitute on od attorney general bishop 0 of 1 e state of utah was asked as ked in ren ard rd there thereto to his official opinion as that the precinct m meant cant the tin atins precilla and not tile the justi file the precinct K or constable cap pinion oi of the tha A attorney general r antly settles the atie oon in va ed the aber boners toners i nerson nf tit alip cert ilicito I 1 nomination nom nation give their pluet 0 residence at lopan legan hyrum wil wi l ville smithfield but do to not iii ii i in what voting otin 7 precinct ol 01 it s i places place they reside ai there irr are till each of baj places more than ol 01 nf botin voting I 1 precinct ire which should limb been bated for the hp gu daiev of avy person json C 8 waw desired ired to inquire inn thle validity of the certini ate rf if nomination nation filed by the party in this matter mutter I 1 bavi as a prec precedent ellent the ruling of the county clerk of U aher county sustaining an objection similar to this 11 in view of ane opinions above cited both Foe lining to follow the law I 1 sustain tile the said baid object objection ion and consider consid fr that fach cne n si signer ner of said bail calp or a like certificate shall bo arid add his hib place of residence to signature sign atule so ro tha no quenion quer que tion rasy may be raised in what precinct each signer resides the ol action that the notary certificate of acknowledgment and oath w is rot not sufficient I 1 stin ana con strained to 0 o say that the same seems to be in proper form except thit the names name of tho the signers are ara not included there inand as this appears to he a defect for remedy the ob ejection is the 4 hereby Fu stained way ile be repealed aled and said defeet defect cured as ag provided by bv law when the he nomination nominations ire bre so made they will be dv iv placed laced upon unon the official ballot for or cache county ir II J clerk |