Show I 1 BEFORE JUDD the case or george glorso 11 bring hall of co I 1 inta joseph Jos cili murdock halt ha three is i ell living and is ii au an old mio man after A hicl dialogue nith the lie judge tile the nolarie five cre das J 11 halt i two nit ti lot itty rixta lomars old is ii now and hin haq been for leoine ine tinge lising alone sixty a jivis 11 VS and costs in the cain of george gi orre 11 I 1 ull 11 judge Du senbei ry for the liea aca fondant cn ilant lead icid ic id to tile the court a petit petition lou signed igard liy by about four hundred of the ii I i ci cilium liem allt of tile county tn tell of 0 ilia jurors I 1 attlio lie heard lie defend ailts statement ind hat alo si gurld a polli t gi on in his lii behalf the judge also niale tit an eloquent in bois beis hilf of the hie de stating that the second wife linal had now front from tier lir husband ig and nd boull contino sons so M long as ai tho the firt firA nife lived mr I 1 it a in liis ilia behalf d fly by tho the Uis cret university atilt followed hilll 1 I I 1 tit a sat ement of if the cabe and asked tr for leniency lout yourself in hill aiace wn all lio 10 asked the hie co I 1 I 1 t to todo do mr lit D evans said tit tint it lie agreed with his predence 3 ors ili ii to HIP flip li honesty of the defendant but did not agree with them that it was 1111 riot not known that hey were inar biej and further that no w fe in the condition of the firall fir all should be deserted as ai this woman tins nas the file court wanted to hear front from 1110 do feril tending lill george it II stated that his mccoull wife had leon out everywhere with hini and that chit lie ile 11 ld id no 10 idea of breaking the liw two cither civil or religious lie did not flot believe flip liw law nai applicable able to ilis eme cae under I 1 lie lie first knew of it being ng biml all ahe 7 law who ile III I 1 wis tull hild thit lint lis wife iff hinl had been the court said tile petitions cannot shift tile hie of tins tills teatter if IE you will I 1 promise to aiva iva within tile llie liw law froni now on oil pill c ill cut till tile gor diall illicit so us ili lir fir al a we ile cm call churl that will not ilu du adint my I 1 an am willi billing nilling fig to 10 do in my Y I 1 ery cry bet iw t it lit t i it t court mr mor ia nii unior sr stand it iud ifko 1 I lire re not no willing wi ing to olic ll it Brini hall ye sir air I 1 ant willing to 0 riby it court then you go co lioni abe wished to 10 holy iov to net let bonard bis second wife currl the ourt is i not lidi large to 10 answer john adams clime forward and mr r milner M or it nl i ifor for him that liu lie half hail bl arru flying g it to live within tile llie law but lie to provide for hits lii wife ni lie tills been doing Defor adint saia that lio lie intended to in obry obey the lle lauw li w court you go home ionic durin during g good lif anlin itai bior the jurors were nere here and cattle in n tu to render a in f ivor of tile the plaintiff in tile the ale of jedediah Xi ikins vs ill lynnn it atou 0 6 ot ct a nl ani anielli elbi slat r vs geci george e notice was ua asti ahalt it baill mose to pet aside injunction injun clion Il eating set for april 27 1 lasu untied baates Is lien v durow the ali J fend tit int t I 1 lealla leAl ld not pally eo 0 o a charge of selling liquor trial set for my may 2 horace hot vs lite lin stock sock flip plina tiff ills given notice 1 HI I given of a motion for a new dow in fro il al united stites states Is 5 thomas it i ack sall defend ant was with adultery hall no to make sentence twelve month raj nui cots collis joseph C shalley on oil ill hie sauie charge recoiled six sit mouths 18 I 1 oil nd costs cost hal had wen guilty of unlawful sen sentence t once fise fic months all anil j costs in ili the cise case of 0 Sail luel Brig linggi gli for adultery sentence win walo set fur sept 23 1889 united states vs william Willii ini grant aluster al ullery y iio v 0 promise prom divent twenty go I 1 ah s a aal 11 I 1 costs coas united states vs is syl ester urail brad ford un lanful cohabitation tile lie tie dc fondant had no promise to make ni ikc sentence ilas das 25 find costs Il anielia young annn vs TS miller bros at phun tills costs cost in ili the caces or 0 nasli tit T schofield uro anil and IV V ill leasol va P C peterson stay ot of I 1 or eca lings was akil for ten tell diya anil le notice given of 0 motion for or new trial S N L herald |