Show argal amm lwin in oy ell A A in alio amak ell tury how ho he camo to bo be sued by a alb local agent for breaking ao an to loc ice toro tore the lecturer 0 ony aly hid 1 I tit nit ati hour nud mud is a bw balt to acola to the oudie audience nce ou on me ing to no Is ceaty teofe of a train for landou at A tb the agent insisted inflicted on a apsch 0 1 in irod often action etc ate mr lorbes refu o I 1 to lo 1 lecture turo and vias vaa nearly mobbed method at tit llie a jo do pot tho the case was tried with ith the follow log raaul to film cont nion it en an that he low no acting io in the abo interests of 0 tho the people iu in pro hibit tho the curtailment of the lecture mine was troa that the lecture hour was eight mad and iho womanly aoa only an hour and it a limit long when tho were protract cd it w as of nanct other oratory in proof of my I 1 ad to read my lecture to the abo court but the lh tury jury visibly and th thal judge jude aad said life vc too short for this kind of evidence ho however ever be summed up in roy my favor fator and th abo I 1 jury I 1 try follo followed mcd hr him lead so BO that I 1 won m roy only wy lawsuit liw auit tho the plain tilT appealed to a higher eigher court in london and the case caio c camo ame on before lord coleridge ho he ina buado vory short abort work of the matter ile it t bori I 1 ib acknowledged said ho he by the th defendant that his bis lecture is awn an hour and ft a half bolt long and it ib seems tho the plaintiff u wonted allied it longor longer vow now I 1 hold he continued any amy lecture is ia a common nuisance that lii l lod lodter r than on an hour and so 0 o I 1 the up all flee acal U |