| Show MILLIONS I IN THE I SMELTER SHELTER HR BUTTLE i 1 the Utah Consolidated Mm Min Mining lIn III ing Company Says as a Further Answer II ITS CHEAT DAILY TONNAGE Claim that Ores of Its Immensely lilacs Hues Cannot be bc Profitably Shipped Out of ol Utah MUST OPERATE ON PRESENT SITE l ot to tb D So 0 It U Avers Ayers Will IiI Compel The Tue Suspension of Its Mines Outlook for or Hearing 0 w w 1 M POINTS rOHns IN orm ONi ANSWER r 5 I i Points int Ir Iri lri thc tho ot of th the tho I If f Itah th Consolidated Mining com coman company pany an fire are o us aa toItO I 1 1 That It Il Its mines mIneR are aro located In Iii y I II canyon 1 I j That these tite tire arc worth not lets t thin I II j I That defendant employs 1 1111 mm 11 at nt average dully dally waga of ot oti i J r rf f lt Its salary schedule Is lB In 1 I excess of ot each tuch month I That JOO tons of at ore are shipped i from mm mines minIs to smelter lOeh eteh In flay any I That this ore cannot be profit profitably I l ably aWs shipped out of ot tho the state That mat If It prayers of plaintiff ure are 1 1 grunted It U mu t opeuS S I lion tIon That th the which the I farmer fanner alleg Is III very 11 ery f I 1 I That rt It Is III willing to 10 pay till nil l 1 damages for which It I Is 18 molly of responsible I 1 f That Its lis property ti in III far snore more i valuable than thun that of or tha farm farmers r t ers making complaint I That It II t pays n a year In x 1 taxes tae an and supports people t t in tn t That Thit complainants offered no noi i objection tv to It the tho ot or ott Ita t t In their midst I That U it l I perfectly recty wining to A Ap 1 p experiment a it view vial jo to ran ren on A l ie lew ItI harmful the l lI 1 I from tt Its plant x That rt As h a EL finality the Ihl plaintiffs I Ib b be liven given no relief relict and aint that they IhY b be e estopped from fron efforts A Ac at nl r redeR d ell c W w wT T I morrow t Is IR th the th day set sel et for fol the States StAten company th lb American Smelting to tile Ille answers to 10 th the suit for l injunction against In by the allied farmers farmen of Salt Lake valley n aIk 11 e last April With the t two o already e h by the an ant and Utah wilt will iu complete the replies replIe of the people and the ease ne will vIII then 11 i t nit alt It argument before Judge Mat shall The evidence In the case ense will he bo tho thu extensive and complicated of any i n ace ne e vet vt argued d In the Plate It Is thought ani and will no doubt doutt consume a u aI I period of time Should Judge Mar Ma hII decide not to hear the tha evidence he may appoint a 1 master InI IIII In III I ry to listen to the ol evidence and andI 1 I II 1 Mils his the taking of testimony VIM 1111 II probably b begin within the next few Pk ki put Jut should hI Judge Marshall hear hoor th ease u It Is not thought that It 11 will in until after atter his ls return from Ian Kan Pi It ity where he M goes to hold court courtr torr Tf r slight Impression of how ex exare x Me Ir are aie the Interests Involved mA may Mined train from the statement which lb 0 I tali Consolidated Mining company KS In Its 1111 answer of ot the sl size eizo e of It Iti M rt and aj Ih the men employed TUB Jm Fit F M MILLIONS INVOLVED I I r the heading of ot a Further Ans vr r the Ihl document goes on to state nf nt wr tr answering all nil tho the allegations of ot tha Iho I roll hitI of complaint that It 11 owns mining 1 III 11 In Canyon And iv n In Hull Inke Lake county Utah and ha haq Jim bc been and now nos Is engaged In ox cx tr tra f II tIns or ores from th the tho mine win b by tramway to the town lown of ot li un and jn from toni there thero to the smelting lani by y rail the tho smelter being leIng used 1 exclusively to 10 reduce the oren oret fr n r m ItI th the Ihl mines Thi said smelting plant l Is lit modern and ands andIs Is s specially erected for tor the tho reduction And d r of such mich ores The plant is mo modern anil equipped with the latest 1 a nid best het constructed accord hig 11 ig t to 10 th the most mast modern and approved PIn and l Is 19 operated In n IL careful I bald Aid plant Is worth and I amway cost copt Is 18 tOO n ald mines lre e Worth at nt least the sum Rum 18 of or sIll nail defendant has hal employed on wild t JmWa cost rosr Is und Inc said Ild mines minesH It H Im smelter lter I about ito to men who are Iro Paul paid in Sn AI average wage ng of or 27 per day ng gr Jr gating a monthly expenditure for Ages ot or on AT DAILY DAIY bOUt About OO tons ton I of or t ore are lre shipped f pr r da y from said Raid mine min I to said Id b t f K pant nl 1111 1 or ores os cannot Profitably shipped awny from Utah 1 sp r can Jn n ores ho bo shipped to 10 nn any In tab tah an and profitably worked without being bring Ildo as lS to damages damaged a 55 mode male by hy the orators In this Baton if rf the defendant cannot ll D ls smelter r at nl the thc present location it I wIll wi I hn 15 cOmpelled t tf hI Ru suspend pend the tho op oil station erlton or of f Its Is said tubes smelting tramway and Ind cease Its business 1 This d defendant In tho the operation of ot Its s and smeltIng smelling 11 ane plant consumes hrh arh ty Sy about aboul 26 tons of ot coal cOI und Ut other In hi r proportion This nit smelting plant Is 18 lo Jo lonU r In the tho i nf of other plants nU all 11 nf of which have hae been heen for or many y nr In reducing ores The lon In the vicinity I Is IR thin and scat Mat by Y and but Is Iii II Injured night such Ruch extent smoke mok And ald then only to a I It If this defendant should bo ho com corn 1 to o suspend Upen the operation of ot Its plant iA eVen evert for far one dA day ilay It n would sus IUS large financial loss loa ut at II least leat hen ien Would be directly thrown out jO of ot employment besides beside tho the losses Unit that accrue In other othe wayn II IAN N PAY f If I nl any property belonging to 11 any of if If the urn oratOrs torn m 8 damaged by hy this U It Is 18 only lo to a II i slight extent and such orator can Cain be hi and and ado In lii On Omi the tho bluer hand hanl the tho damage to 10 this de do defendant fondant It f compelled to 10 H us ni would be Irreparable This Thil IH la solvent and will wil respond In Iii II whatever nIl any almy of o ora omI torn toni 1011 may recover rr ITS T J mu This Tills defendant payo annually In hi tax taxes es OH Il In time tho State of or Utah the tho sum lum of ot about 2100 GOO anti and all idl ni or nf sold eald defend defendant ant allis pay ny fur far In iii II excess of or the thu taxes paid 1 by saul said orators und and the ulue of nf f the thio ProudLY property rt of ot eald lull defendants Is of at tar far fi greater ullo and benefit ti to the i late Blite of nf IC Utah ami to the welfare timid and pro of ot of ot tIme state thin hi is all ni the he proper o ot of I alj all I nu a Is it and nil t Ui tho a l b by said Mild and It Its I people generally 1011 t the im taxes ia paid all h by 1311 mild Hall hi defond a n tim from the a l Inc Incidental Id en tu I benefits del I veil from mid 1111 defendants far fil ex exceed exceed eld 11 any benefits that mi mi may come 1010 train from said Mid orators to 10 the Utah of ot or orto orto orto to It ltd I people generally Ti TIO WHO AI AUK DEPENDENT N NTh Th Thoro ro are about In II Utah who whole are le directly and indIrectly dependent upon the operation of ot the tho smelters by hy suit and 1111 such people as nR well wel us ni state fur far til more public front from the operation of f said smelters 11 taking into on the damage dolie by them that would result to 10 the thu people Pelie of Utah and to to 10 1 UK Its public wet wel el tl fare fura 11 I und mind nd If it I said Ild smelters vero closed down amid olt said MId ld orators un no ants I In nn nay any uny woy h by said defend defendants defendants vI TO 10 The machinery and 1111 devices used Isell In smelting change from rom roni time to time and amid d defendant Is willing mind and 01 eager gel to 10 ex cx expend tl pend all money mOley In the im tin improvement provement of ot Its Is sm smelting plant or upon which will wi Ihl In any Iny way wity r render le less leis injurious the operatIon of ot UH plant Smelting plan plants Is have erect erected eret ed Ni d maintained and operated In Inthe II the vicinity of this defend nots plant the year 1810 and such smelters smelter from froni time the beginning hIL have done Ion more lilore morE or le less 1 Injury Injun to the and amid crops of ot said Mid orators and other persons Said orators or of ot them thor Imo knew of such damage long Ions be ho before tore lore this Ihl defendant operated Its Is smelt smell smelting lug ing Nevertheless they stool Blood stoll quIetly antI and to by made no objection either the erection of the plant or Its Us later latem Illel enlargement or 01 Improvement many ot orators and other pcr Iler mor I Hona ns located there fliers donated either land landor or money mony or both for the of ot Inducing raid smelters to 10 locate loate there to 10 erict maintain and amid nd operate hinging plinK Said taId Hild orators t ar r mommy many maly of Pr them knew ninny years eal ago ngo as its I much about the Iho spreading of t wild said alleged area Iren of ot damage us mis lS tho they Know low at It tho time pres present prel cut ent Im time Nevertheless they thoy not miot only quietly remained by and witnessed tho time tr erection ton of ot saId Mild 1 plants hut but butIn hutin In many 4 Improved and encouraged aged the construction maintenance und ammi operation n of niah plants plant WANTS NC NO IO f Gm time the defendant prays In Inclosing Inclosing II closing thin that wild said Ild complainants may lay be ho begIen gIen Illen no Ito relief that Mid il complaint tints mints may be he held to 10 be estopped and guilty of ot Inches and Ime that this tt nt may be he dl dismissed II hence without him harm hlll mum an am l I with It II I It I ts c rost sU timid and for tor such mich other pioN r roust relief a as mi mommy may be he Just mm and nul ci Ju It a bl In th tim sos |
