Show Att apostle lestle Snoot snows ss bunse V v 1 jallman 20 all interesting 3 lonnon cne 1 entitled 0 o EJ A pare in ID ili the 0 mitter of 1 lorewzo arenzo snows petitioner peili louer assi anil IV a ellart el laut camo came up bof argument in the a LI lulled cited States Supreme cout filter hsiou snow citizen ot of utah was waa indicted tried and guilty sa of t three c be parate chaize vl w I 1 t c 0 h I 1 t a t I 1 0 s alth I 1 t I 1 I 1 es ill b I 1 0 v a u u 1 0 ouica u 1 C fu 1 h 0 n 1 ho a f called A 1 of his taic wayts ives alid I 1 91 said la ins each indict client to bare been milli lilt the time wo we wen but tile the cover different time lime iona one being for or tile year lq isalt 3 oi ictor foi 1831 and the tur for mouths nio ith 1 l ot of the 0 tier was sentenced la in case 0 o IV ix nall the t were consecutive each to begin as soon not tile the previous otie terminated affer snow bait bad served out his b term lerm ot of im pr I 1 8 to he bo applied to the be third D district I 1 rici court ot of utah for or a dho discharge charge upon a carrie of habeas on the ground tint that he bil bad committed auly one continuous that bat the judgments in two ol of ilia iho easel cases were void lla lie maintained I 1 lint the llie court bad no right t to t the lie continuous offense luto into Ee parate ind distinct I 1 periods and then try and punish him three times llorca for or the same alleged critic the district court lion bell ever d decided that upon his oil own n allowing he bo was va not entitled to a nod denied his petition for or 1 a I writ of habeas corpus broin I 1 lr I 1 rom oin that decision be lius lias up ap Ile alett lo 10 tilts cot court I 1 rt |