Show I 1 th defendant is Dischar discharged god mier after a brief hearing KEITH WAS NOT intimidated he did not voto vote because he was satisfied he had no DO sight right to I 1 1 I 1 lie li lic carill iring i of t alif ile faar cast a again aielt t R W loin editor of tim JoVIC NAL fur for ill in a voter otel elble tip upon 0 sat ir day tile caring ri ring I 1 liil kiil all been transfer tram ed front froni the hie arnitt ofa ol 01 C U C Go covlin ti if that of 1 nt lit tile lie vollin etuy in iii tane of 0 commissioner himself the ali cabo mas is wl sel to lit lie heard at 2 p ill all ami tin tilt notified it 11 fuw few minutes past basl that hour the trial actually biegan sit at 3 mr cluan slue in I 1 manol as not I 1 d until the ease m as well along alon is as liu lie 11 not at cat aniu e to delay thu the hea li earing ri ng alter a time ime U 11 II ll artand NA lc Wair arap feared in liis his l liil kiil commissioner Goodw iii nylo issi ed I 1 alio lie complaint stated tatt lie appi app arcil earol in tile use as prosecutor at tile I 1 n quest of 0 fletcher r that ilia his position tiou as a re 1 ti biwan a elliff gestra rt tion officer ut of tin tile county roi being at tile polls anti its af tile to bafo alion the coin plaint had beell and alad now 10 atto inel wai n 1 peculiar one and mid and lie he 11 wished it understood der stood that there was is no personal feel feeling ilig in this allair and it mas done solely with it a 11 view ul of prot protesting erting tile billot ballot and protecting every in the light of 01 cai casting ting his ballot without therel rom by intimidation or tin eats it I 1 wits better that lite test teal be made ill it ii ease cube like sir mr sloans than on some pour aej sun m less familiar with I 1 legal fortins forms who alio 1 I okill lind find difficulty dilli culty in da defending ali I 1 liin I 1 i insel wll 1 nill all I 1 IMI preliminary binary matters mere waived a anil tile the bean hearing I 1 ig of u tilt casp began by bv calling sir aaion jewitt Deli vitt lie he testified tint that sir keith hal been beel I 1 cha challenged ilen edana and that sir mr sloan iloan had said paid keith feitli wo would libl be arrested if lie voted voled but tile llie litt witness lebs rould could not lot till to huia tile remark was mas was addicted T A 1 thore jon testified sided te to the challenge of sir keith and to mr loan remarking klinl the gentleman would mould be if lie dill did vote lie he coil could ad not liot recall the exact words nor tell whether I 1 they addi addressed essed tu it C C Good goodwill iii or sir keith or the judges of election mr 11 II 11 keith file took tok the stand sir mr keith testified to having hn ing offered ili his billot ballut on oil august ad tu to lug 1118 bein challenged ic beti to tile the Il matter latter being beiji referred to tile utah commission Cominis sion and die care chinina up again je ile testified hearing lieari iw sir air sloan say hay if lie he votes ile e will have hini arr arrested alsted as we propose to find out how the thing ann cnn can go legally lie ex pressed d the beli erthe remark acin ir was made to lo 0 C goo livin olwin by sir t sloan in the ali cross ax by sir i loan sir keith feitli was asked were you intimidated and deterred from voting by the remark made that you would bi arrested a if you voted mr keith so no sir sir goodwin then to took sir nil keith in fit band and stated that the witness i his oi own n was an unwilling one and finally said if you were vi ere not intimidated mir did you not vote if mi I 1 feitli bc mccause cuse it was clear to tilt that I 1 liall had no right to vote the county registrar tile the opponent of llie lie defendant at the polls ane united states ioner lielot belot C w m horn the complaint wi vb bm orn oril out the prosecuting attorney now also add added e d to the otell kotlier r witnesses es and swore point blank that sir sloan laid baid to mr beith eith at the polls on election day day it if boll vote I 1 will have you arr arrested estef I 1 lie I 1 C also to a nil m ber ol of other tri trifling flin matters and on oil croba ky by mr hart proceeded to argue N hen left asked if lie did nut not know it was just as great till offense odense to try and induce it a man to vote mho ho had to no legal light fight to boso doso do so a as it was to endeavor to deter front from voting a man w I 1 ho had a right to vote wien when the commissioner rested ilia his own case and ilia hia own testimony mr clait hal t lived for a dismissal dis of the ense case ile ie taid said tins tile whole affair air was of an all outrageous rag ivous and while lie would noc say it was a 1 case of um licious prosecution there 1 were I ere circumstances surrounding g it that justify such a declaration while making aking ili this lie was interrupted by C C Good winand andriso aso by anil told him to confine aunt me himself to tile motion lie ile insisted on oil liia his right to proceed in that line lite if lie desired to but said lie had made adl the lie remarks ili that strain lie I 1 wished to ile he then mid was mas no evidene to allow shiow that there biad been any anny intimidation and the fie person aggrieved I 1 alio ho knew whether hether or not lie had been cell intimidated had sworn that lie was not intimidated and lit 1111 testimony was to any other oilier effect the case should be dismissed tile tha commissioner without hearing from the prosecution alio mo t tion jolt and mr airon 1 F farr was call called ed for tile dete dele iise tibe ile he testified to being present at the lite time and that tile tie dc had stated aliat sir mr knitli if lie voted N couii it arrested is as the question tion would lie tested in the courts mr moan loan then tool look the stand a and nd swore to practically pr tile tho bame state ol of facts both sides rested and C 0 G goodwill clo divin began 1 91 i the f aliat L talk tor lot tile prosecution by altai stating g t eliat there could liu ile to no malice i iu the affair airas as lie he was mas in ill it a position to know kilow ti the I 1 e complaint having lieen been sworn aborn to before bei I 1 liim and lie ile blida cognizant of tile facts boullit tu to know inis case wits was brol brought lIdit to test tile the light of a 1 man mall to stand at the alie polls anti and intimidate persons by threatening ainest lie proposed to set iw i w that cleatious were ere cun cult flitter flitted flit ted properly prop ropel eily ly and fairly as tile they had alwaes fluen been while hile lie was as hief chief registration officer of this count county and it wits was liia his to seo see that every cilie ii be IrU tL cited ted in ill tile alio dearest right of citizenship the right to vote vole thill that settle sell led the malice part of the watter mailer it was evident I 1 lie continued that sir fr keith wits was an all 11 unwilling aw ll 11 ing witness and lie IH wished tile bonit to pay nu no attention idony 11 Y nail as it MH singular lio lie shoula lioi iM 0 go o t here to cat ca t hill bin vote vole anti anil tilt alun it leave h utter iter tile the defell dant t without vot in ing if lit N as not liot lit ih terrel from voting by reason ot ali ali volk s hofei and ami lio lie contended conten deil that ir sloan tam aa guil billy ty its charged A abitt f ter ft a illicit aim t between the anil in ins hn attorneys mr I 1 r mom in aroe aro uro e abill lil ded to lo park k on oil cafe lie ile said ill lin cafe mils m as it one olle tile lio of tile the ili diio in arutiun lecuit till af A i in pillar ill title line licar lio lie was it P jolt acillis as a 1 eplly licali vote vole valt ritt her nil it I 1 be eliy of cle till us is chief registration ion of officer figer ns as tle astler l 0 of I 1 tin the complaint is as and 1110 a in tills particular case iiii case CAM sia aas 3 un binler ler tin the territorial ami it has as a little diore than singular siny ilir I 1 tile hie pro for the Coli county lity ME lio HUS its d iff ing hig the cases against iiii ml tile alleg c a violation violit iun 0 of aliu li I 1 wit not appear in like case and not if it was not a 1 l ll 11 rt e 1 1 9 t 1 t ir i i r iii happily i i ip il alio io 1 c t 1 I 1 i 11 10 I 1 1 0 of f 1 1 1 isicc i in i 1 t the li C ansu tas U W was not left to the iiii that tin tile explanation matle by b linn set clcil ill it was it 11 little gratuito ili lion that did not batile M atle it 1 I 1 have sonn some ritts 1 ili this matter anti anil hinato siy say about tir te malice and I 1 wili NO 11 it un I now that the liole bole abrail all air ill le be sifted to tile bottom thank toil tilt sav ia as to our elre elections tiona was not mt act M t left V in tile handt of nf choie in 10 icae cise appointment and continued ollice hviding tin tilt had no voice if it 11 antian citi zeli N was as tie priced of if liis ilia light to tn see tint tha elections lie e were to warn those it lose attlio 1143 vi olite tn V I 1 VI c lion lite lie cerati lie might to 10 know it I 1 ilo do not i to ill pros echtor in ft leard fur for it ft pure jure elet elc t tol on I 1 1 I rejoice that bluit 1 below belong to it il party one of 1 I hose fail Ini principles is is I 1 he right eglit t evera every citizen to it iee ec laws in in 1 I acl he w I 1 id inter interest esteil dl are holl Iio nestly estly niini tell dol did not nol recognize till the pomer of il a few to eav mho should be pro buil ani and 11 attlio to not lie ile shielded froni from prosecution prom cuilon no in holding olrick outside tlc alc silt I 1 ift 0 of tin tile 1 I people cople c can bast ine in ill hi desile for it a pure ilare ind A 1 lull and lit an honest electon nr IT in anxiety it I 1 1 biety for every man mail tose vitic in liiM vote anil 1 l d it mas because of tile of tile the 11 11 ty to winch which I 1 belong that we w tuli tit ti t to tile fullett fular t extent the pox 4 r of non residents to coille alicle sin sally 1 or I in herds and direct our elections anil alit overthrow throw the Ni igan s of lom the law deci atus j the remark ass mss ab made to 2 sir keith turning to the evi delco tile the speaker peake r I 1 the intimation intini ilion of tin fit tp autor that tile testimony of A I 1 I 1 is ON it witness mr keith lie discarded ilis carucI forsooth it was not of it il nature that lie had exper tell teil hero here iva was tile direct evidence ut of the one ICI person SOIL alleged to have been ng aggrieved grieved that lie ile hall not been abed ile he practically prati cally state that lie believed lie could vote vai lai her ter lint on litra alic catir arrea tir tur ledge judge of what tile liw law designed brought out liy by tin tile discussions dicus lie hi leathed tile Orich sion ision that lie hall had no right to y vote of C a and U 1 I I 1 I 1 i etc for forr left and did not ote not because fcc acim of what tile defend but in ili cause of dealer light andyes and yet because thi aliis s iliin hoaas lie witness forthe for alie prose prosecution did not give ach tel lechli ii aa it wits was hoped lie ix would ouli kive give then the prosecutor hoped to strengthen ins his case calse by discrediting the hie testimony ony of hi 40 n hide bide and intimating aba t mr keith was guilty of perjury pei jury mr sloan iloan i said lie had been content to lime hae theca alie case heard liv by sir fr goodwin and when it il was tran transferred sherred to sir mr fletcher lie as content ki knowing lowing that lie he would eive justice and that there were ere always allys other oilier remedies open to him ili m the prosecutor si spoke poke very briefly and the ut it some cillie length and with much clearness bummed up tip anti and stated s that lit could not see CC biere the ailed all ged intimidation had taken place the person himself hini self testifying that lie had not been deterred dete red ired ani aad b he e therefore C dismissed tile case |