| Show ABE f OF f fM DURAND M r J JUSTICE n t LN Yesterday Hearing on Charge of Threatening 0 To do Murder WOULD KILL EDITOR SAID HE H O ow lie b bon i ion l II On I Urich harl F Durand justice or of M i J who was n as ar arr aron aN aNI of Murray I r e C charge hargO of threaten 7 on oD ol a 1 A tf Ir murder came ame up for t I it Ir l jutO Holm yesterday yesterdayS t tr S tAr l t nine wILne was wa J 1 S 8 1 rK r of br tHi t Murrar Eagle I f ril i ji is W hl lU that Mr Ir to 10 tok ta he te edt editors r t t F L out of or certain ar are JK sed in tn Mr Barlow paper t I t IB tbt doings doi I S or alleged mis mi mirane c rane In hi his hlf official ca canor cad cad Id d I made war upon the th 1 nor I r him ilm with being a tool J r 0 t Luke of Merchants Pro fame fome SED EDA AND D THREATENED so o Incensed at the ther r I j him that he went vent venti n i rffie nil n the night of ot tug Aug us usI t I ii I l wJ cursed cursell the editor I I IP idea a throat threat as nl follows r t v th rh h tAP of ot your our head oft ott o oU a TY 1111 me again so ao help helpt me mer U t v r r I Durand would ouId cary ear er his hist j execution u ution Mr Ir Barlow cle lele cletic t 11 1 tic tt lt sheriffs h office and had hade hadi t i e i aced under arrest e t 1 yesterday Mr Ir Barlow 1 ti lj P madA the throat threat 1 nl his testimony was wu wasi as ra i t y J P Cahoon V Y r d I J HM wS 8 presented by b Atty A Ag AHn Hn jg g and tho the defense con cont t it threat nan w all made con conI cone I e I i 1 t that his client lied hall the theet rt et I J i the threat As s 11 an Illus he Id i r A t Mf ns to burn Bs house home houlet pia t sM git to fo threaten to shoot A Aa Aa a e f ruts his Ills foot on Ils 1315 r r J n 1 i a match on his person Fi JQ DAYS DATS VA YS GRANTED I 3 Iv y v Ally Atty Willard Hansen I r the state said saM there fit I I 1 a 4 I no flO comparison between j ur J r and tho thu rasa ease A H X augh He suld said that a n na ara ra a 1 a JI L 1 I the tho right to publish tho the thoa thea a jI man In Its lis columns and if It ifF ItI F r v CI I 15 made were ere not true Jr J 1 i rt had recourse In tho the theL ti f I L no right to threaten the thee theS e S H 11 m in granted five days das to the tho theS t S 4 I h to submit written r a decision will be forth S r I |
