Show before befaro commissioner pletcher fletcher in ili the alic case of frank A grant vs F fred red turner for money alleged to be due dueon on cert certain aill promis ory otes notes given in ili payi ment nent tor for I 1 life af pf in lieurance uie S urance ac policy the following evidence was introduced grant vae nas called for tile and testified that turner signed the I 1 notes ly and the notes were then introduced when the plaintiff rested F turner was called and sworn lie testified that ho signed tile notes but 0 on n a verbal agreement with plaintiff that w were e r e t they 1 ley n bot ot 1 paid 7 q 1 I nt at n maturity at u r itri t the bo i insurance n s ti r a n e e co company n p t n would i ou 1 d 1 let e t them er a run u 1 1 lie ile said that be had told the agent that lie ho could riot not take tile the insurance as aa lio lie was vias not certain lie could lift it the notes at maturity that the agent promised hirn him that lie he should not be pushed if ho he was not ready but that ra a the col company was loaning money anyhow tile the stid said notes could run u with it 17 t the 11 e p policy of I 1 e Y don kimball stated that the same agreement was made with N ith him when lie ho waa as induced to take insurance of the sarno same scent agent in the same company J T hammond in subs substance stilted stated the same and that lie he had been asked for the money due and had dmd the notes 11 0 0 rich swore that ho ba had bee been n app approached d in the same iian way but ila had not taken any insurance the court considered the case all night and summed up tile alie evidence in ili detail next nest rooming morning after which lie rendered the following judgment this cause coming on tor for trial upon the complaint om faint answer and evidence and I 1 it a jury u ry L being e ng writ waived vea was wag submitted to 0 the e court after hearing tile thy arguments of both parties and being fill fully ay advised lit in the premises found as aa foll follows I 1 I 1 that the notes sued buca on oil heroin herein do not fall duo due until the ath dayl of may IM 1693 ahat there is due on notes ai a accrued interest thereon the sum gum of I 1 2 that defendant offered in whitin writings tins by his bis answer filed herein before trial to confess judgment for 1350 and costs accrued but that plaintiff refused to accept said offer judgen judgment is therefore f ore re rendered against said defendant fur for tile alio eum of ISSO 1350 and tile the of the said defendant which accrued itce rued after the baid suit quit are hereby taxed a against ainest said plaintiff in the sum of said sum sura of costs to be deducted from plaintiffs tills Flain judgment herein against sai gaii defendant |