Show PLAIN KITH tiova FACTS hould a bounty bo will gian ti alls sugar ar makers sao by the atil utah of lagi ii turc jal the dill result would be 11 pull and B challenge suu any one DUO to ol disprove ir that liate our ano home consumer would be obliged p to ill sui pay more jolt for their homi made sugar than would dill con ill sumers of JO IV adjoining 1 states if 71 a bounty were allowed POl lr who kl would have ut to ol pay cut eliat bounty the taxpayers of utah pun and aitu IV a bounty of jo one duo cent per pound fa ii paid to ol a ns sugar afa fic bictory tory Sj it 1 ST is pi by utah con umers of JO f 0 if this sugar afons can I 1 lie sold in tit county J for 1 1 1 ix x cents aaa s a pound it I 1 cn be i plo old in it colorado we k ila wyoming ak 11 southern nob idaho a 6 n eastern nevada for dill the panic hut mark you C the dill difference n collauo county gill taxpayer Jaked pur and avina consumer 0 jo pays one duo cent lu to 01 bounty in ut addition to 01 every cents t yorlli allio illio of jo Ms sugar aej lulli off he bu i sill his ons sugar arl therefore costs him n all cents per jod pound N w oil lie consumers ul in adjoining stat oril have oft nil bounty to ol rd pay they gi sugar at the all I 1 regular alln six ccok price without lie tin till ca tica can ti anent ofa bounty being added jilio I 1 friends alb ee iju an justice 0 it in a system a enable an institution to oi I 1 11 Q sit its own supporters the dili f price jam MX xa cents it i med b q way SLA of JO example pul and if 31 the all re aj i II 11 sugar be I 1 or ao S it 11 does 11 it i dill |