Show JUDGMENT AFFIRMED Supreme Court ourt IAns ci Trl rn Ii taut I In III I The Th of o the Ihl lower court In Inthe Inthe inthe the case call of Illa Folia of oC the estate of ot K E t J I mae appellant vs 11 John W V ha hat has J been een etli ll by IJ the supreme court urt III In an opinion written by b Justice McCarty and find con oon concurred in by b Chief Justice Ju timid and Justice Justlee rhe The action was wat first brought In the city Ill court where h ro an nn attachment was M issued and amid a 11 levy Il made upon belonging to defendant Judgment was wu I against a defend defendant mint ant fur for UK antI ami coats conis and mud he thereupon to the Ih district court In iii that court Judgment was again rendered in i favor of oC plaintiff for JIM SI and costs coatH amounting to 10 f The amount collected by b proceedings wax was nut credited on omi time the judgment In the district court where there whereupon whereupon thereupon upon defendant went Into court and asked aked that Ihal an order be made crediting the sum on time the Judgment and anti satisfy satisfying In ing It to 10 that thai extent The order of o op partial p satisfaction tI Judgment was Willi made by b the court and plaintiff thee Ihen appealed from that order The Che supreme court ourt now no holds that Ihal the lower Court hall had a II perfect right to enter such an nn order anti and partially satiety the Judg Judgment judgment ment the Ihl authority to do so MJ being tot sot forth in III the tIme Statutes of oC Utah I I S Hence the Ihl action of ot the Ih tower lower court In is I affirmed und the costs colts of ot taxed against appellant |