Show tariff shot tiia the iii high c it protections projectionists protect ioni of today refer to the period front 1647 to 1801 we hall had lecque itchue tariff us as disastrous troi free trade they jo do this because thy tariffs during g this ahrie were for revenue tha operation of which wits wis to put all producers on oil a plan of equity aud and to give special privilege to none lu ill speaking tins ot t this period mr blamo blame says in twenty years in congress the principle cin embodied bodied ui the tariff of cylc for tile the time to bo be so er entirely vindicated und approved that resistance to it ceased not only among the people but amons among the protective economists ai and 1 d 1 even alinn anians the manufacturers to a 3 11 birge 1 ge extent so general was this acqua acqui esk enco that in 1853 IS ts a prote protea tive tariff was riot not suggested or even hinted by any ona of the tuno abrev parties which presented presidential pi evidential candidates the reasons why the people especially the banners fan ners ere satisfied etli tilt the tariffs of 1811 1816 18 11 16 and IB it was because under nuclei them thein they got the full value of their products tile reason rea sou why they aro are not satisfied now ii because Lo calise they 10 lo do not bot sot got the fill value in products or of their wheat corn and oats from 1817 18 17 to 1861 the average price of corn in new york was 07 vents cents per bushel or this lino line aski r 2 after 3 years cars of bagh protection the average price of corn coni from 1377 to idal has been 5 SK 1 cents per bushel or during our revenue period from 1847 to 1861 the price of anthracite pig iron at philadelphia averaged ive rayed 2123 12 pr por tuu t r mx cc to james 21 swank of tho the lion and steel association durins during the past fifteen years in of grout great improvements in production the price ut of the same quality of pis pig non noa averaged per ton at Philadel philadelphia pLia ait or under our revenue tariff it took 37 G 10 bushels of voni corl to buy a ton of pis pig iron or till ime miller high tariffs ls bolever lio bo wever it lias has iii i enquired 40 J U 10 bushels of coin or nodily 3 12 bushels more to pay tor for a ton of p pis I 1 iron vu tills this comparison is not open to file charge that there have been great improvements prove ments in fit the machinery chinery ina used in raising asin corn and none noce tit in that used in ill pro I 1 icing pi pig g lion oil un on thee the contrary ont the rt rc vei so has been the case tho ti dutli of this chaice of shot is that ill tho e corn producers haci ha ci not boon been nor in the ilia very nature of things could they bo be protected on cu alie ti 11 L other hand tho the tariff on it pig iron 11 has a 3 kept out foreign competition and ana thus eli enabled ablo the iron men to combine to keep keen up prices ashegh as lush as possible to this extent high tariff lias has affected tile tho roni corn producer in that it has required nearly 31 3 bushels more r of corn to buy a ton of pig alt iron during tho the past fifteen years than it did from 1816 to a period which the high fites of today called our arco trade period |