Show 7 A SiU RENDE XH EH tn tilt it lo 10 nl fil c exponent of republic inrid 3 in it article that hat mak maam ft a weah lit ii t tc ic c of anew ine c ring a remark wi we 11 fe eon oil thesia the sugar arar bounty bounty aa ill that it t the 1 10 J jt t 8 s s 11 1 i actually ly f ri 1 riff is i 1 0 I fur for tile the 1 yar pore or of abl industries th desir r es in tin it ir 1 I 1 I 1 ly 1 lies L s we lye admit no to such ahng further on it partially quotes boat we ave did cay f iby c cu irefully binny v suppressing in m the vital I 1 part tart of tile III tion we mado th thus us 11 9 vt mt it pays there is no pa purlieu object objection ion to giving nil an indi itry n I 1 r aby bv 11 14 tion 1 I his Is it a wide de ep partine artine wi 1141 journal from your party arty doctrine dorir piny 0 oppi tile the 11 oil lor for ami pur lir nou 1 ioui ahr tiny day that thai gi ge 1 arwe or e wili ington gil lui liva I 1 i t alic it lirett fira iria hill bill to still stint t s in 1 altu I colonies fil onica 1 1 P 11 itis it by step 1 ow it il because our oar tiari niri lo 10 and av alayious defense that h lie sm mr factora is good it the none ill natel el is doing liet lir thaia it lie be doing hii other anve y bothin but rot rol in your own aul and uli 1111 Northy of if an nii bier jf if tin tilt vill mill M ill recall tl alo wars li 11 is datil bcd in ill congress ftp ik pub sidie feln cw airl 11 ll kicul Kii ul of tAr iiri it it will et ate E t 11 between il ani its itai urty seronil Seron decoll fl aj voil ack aranov tio alip t protection i is 3 a vor cor t the lie jeci tl iu t tonii binl aall tive ia ig the oy correct ye tent of rio ilo ethere if ib to lo beany protection at alt if i dig I 1 lit ronn ary to re pla aba tb ii pa per that is too dence to motif the last co neove that ta acre iq i no ceorl cornet ea tsy system te of protection hoover since the reau rc alican t not coi content tent to retire in ill doii silence aroln a defeat so po sq signal nal aha hat t it dares not let it its reat badr ra dr rg ev t atia I 1 le an we gaw gac to tc its own bra gart question lire ire t tak a IL tire in iu anee snore bore casti av I 1 I 1 q gating r 4 all 0 in urse 99 9 9 t h e att Fent W LI lor I 1 i deary ti 41 J C atu tu it il but wa also dd t atle doe not mean ilia lint I 1 hy by stating that one livni in indred dred years rago n when protection besan began i it t ivas with the distinct and argument th tatt tt protection s hould last only I 1 a few years years protection pros lires cannot rilean mean giving m an all in in saut jant industry a start for each suc cc edin eding 0 year brings li ings a larger 1 and jar larger 0 crop of infants to lit le pro tertod te eted hence we ave are opposed to the thesy system steni altogether 0 temporary bounties would be ba ali only correct system of protection if i wre any ally correct system t but there is not T bounties and temporary protection differ cliffer from perpetual bounties and perpetual protection only in this his L tire lne former are a temporary ati and d the latter bitter a per perpetual letual evil let no lie Jacke jackanapes napes lire tend that lie does docs not now understand our aiu anino 1 0 but vc ave wonder what intelligent inep republicans ta rik of the plea pica of oran or organ 0 an h lias has lasted one Ir hundred indred years anil and is now non higher than it over ever TOS mas be fun fon tempi temporary would it lie ile to conceive a more grovelling 1 I c attempt at than thie three 0 ene rations have parsed yet the system is only just begue and it is only to le ile temporary we sau hau n protection f imply giving an industry a start there would not bo be the same pacific i particular objection to tins this imaginary protection that were there is to actual protection as we ave find it but there would still bo be the general objection action that dicirio chats as our 11 Ke te publican neighbor correctly charges op pule o discrimination for arly any purpose no marter how short the time or how finall f the tax the principle oadis cri nation would baill lie be wrong wong w ong mi thou m ai in m such cases practical men even democrats would bo be likel likely to object less than they do in tile present actual case of protecting hoary and corrupt monopoly great with the guilty strength done of one hundred years plundering plunder inI g of the matfes ina fes of the people anil and this isah the ten sentence tence over which our neighbors impenetrable stupidity is so much exercised aco ashington toli did not sign sigm any ally bill to tos tart home industries but in tile the lan of flit lie bill itself ire for r the support of if the gov for the discharge of tile the debts of the S slates tate S and the encouragement an and protection of bi manufactures all u fact ures protection was the least consideration bonsi in ill tile the tariff of 1769 was declared to be only temporary find and ions to cease in 1796 IT IG in ili this sh a i pa it received the die i up sup port of many decoct democrats at ts including I 1 madison but jefferson disliked lis liked it aba fearing t ring m that it was only the thin thin end of the wedie of monopoly ali jhc thc duties levied by this bill ave averaged r 84 S per cant on oil dij ih tl d imports today to day tha d duns mk q a ela el a over r GO 60 per cent on oil tile the taxed imports i in ports at that dat day y democrats found it dilli cult to appo oppose e this cm rn tax because bi cause all of its pro me motors tors disclaimed discrimination of this thia sort ag a a 0 general policy but expressly declared it to be only it a temporary expedients IER a events have dest destroyed roVed the only argument that democrats he hesitated stated to in I 1 18 vi viz the temporary tempora ry subterfuge and whatever virtue mi might a have buen one hundred years years ago io i o in the ar argument aument that temporary pro protection deetion to manufacture was avas lice essar essary there is none now one hundred years protection of sa said i d imports has ha forever given the lie de to the deception that Ite publican protection is ever to cease for there bo be a crop of infants willing coming on the industries Indu s I 1 M mero e ra cd two ao hundred years 1 v j cyb wo weeks altion loo k up lip th xi y up ion n iiii inh long I 1 0 0 1 I eliu t C ell I 1 il UP wl SR published the questions entire and them in our next IN we e then alien asked that paper some questions on oil thi the azaine subject of courie cou ale it dated not even let it readers know the answer ansiger we made or fee ece f ee the questions we ave asked in turn much less attempt to answer them so like a brownin drow drowning nin man mail catching at straws strai s it rasps grasps eagerly at tw two 0 isolated sentences kenten i ces of ours in ill another article and labors over this 1110 molehill with ridiculous redi culous pomposity ity and bluster contempt is astron a strong word but it fails to express capi ees the feeling which honest inen wast have for a paper which in response e to tile hie full and a and 11 d frank answer we gave to cery cn cry question it put to us on this subject meanly attempts a species of vicious officious cunning in in partially quoting an all opponent to avoid the question at al issue and to hide bide from its readers the answers to io its AS own questions it is tile the republican organ orr mari however and gives ivas the best expression 0 of f republican doctrine of which its par party y is capable it is the medi medium aln through which tle the republican leaders 11 give reasons for their politics to the voters when THE answers the republican oran or organ m an it t hauld bo be understood that tha t it is 1 ani answering the best argument 0 that theli the liest cst brains in the party here can call make let theire be no ali t ikc on oil this point ine we care nothing for these argun lents ite except a as they illustrate the dain rence between the two parties and when the people once understand this differ difference elice we shall lie be content with their whatever it may be |