Show his hia jiblets writes A 11 logan cpr correspondent of the referring to judge fell esons ruling in fit th the thatcher Thatch cr brothers hank bank case vs the city says somebody yome body was mia tikon iken t ile le then begs beg 3 thu the question anil and chows his deep concern in the situation by claiming that the 01 ol old 1 council more acre not filially fatally mistaken the some ono one harrld to is doubtless the cites 0 or its legal adviser anil and in view of the fact that acry point presented by b y them was subdivided BUbla ineil lv by judge I 1 fer iderson nho n lie aco i ell in I 1 ll 11 cifeca that thai tho the money was illegally ob ta noil altho tigh for useful four aur poses posea find I 1 fiust ther crom tic bo re io anil ad ovit lilt none has accuse tile old council of bein being filially fatally i hilt but only ignorantly inor antly mista mistaken ke n the wisdom of lent seeni to be L tile ON oh policy been it inight 1 lieve been more disastrous isa to the ife t old council than their apologist imag ins ins instead or of that tile the new few coil council haq hai apted act cilin lit a spirit of friendliness anil and moderation all arouni anil anal the removal of what otherwise 1 lime remained a black eye for a long time lime to conic collie neither tile the city government nor its 01 opposed tho he payment obligations they only fur for solid ground to bland upon tipon anil awl did as much to gain stil ground as th the other side bide in fact the alicy ilia vastly more 1 he cron ofa a daei decision A bieh says in ill deflect that they did wrong but that innocent pir lies tieS not euner on odthe of the bjong duing is it a little peculiar if not altogether out of place JUb TITIA may 23 JO |